首页> 外文学位 >Personally intrusive cross -examination: How expert response style and gender affect mock juror decisions.
【24h】

Personally intrusive cross -examination: How expert response style and gender affect mock juror decisions.

机译:个人侵入性的盘问:专家的回应方式和性别如何影响模拟陪审员的决定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research has demonstrated that numerous variables affect the persuasiveness of expert witness testimony such as the sex of the expert, the domain of the case, attractiveness of the expert, and level of expertise (Cooper et al. 1996; Krauss & Sales, 2001; Memon & Shuman, 1998; Schuller, Terry, & Mckimmie, 2001). To date, there has been few investigations examining the influence of expert sex, expert witness response style, and attorney questioning style on witness credibility ratings, verdict choice and sentencing recommendations. Mock juror sexism was predicted to moderate the effects of expert sex and expert witness response style on expert credibility ratings.;Results revealed that the male expert witnesses were rated as more likeable and credible than the female expert witnesses. In addition, when expert witnesses answered cross-examination questions in an assertive versus defensive manner they were rated as more professional, likeable, and credible. The use of intrusive questioning by the prosecuting attorney did not affect credibility ratings of the experts, but did result in negative character judgments about the attorney. Expert sex and expert witness response style did not affect verdict and sentencing recommendations and mock juror sexism did not moderate the relationship between these variables and expert credibility ratings. However, credibility ratings of the experts were significantly related to sentencing recommendations. When mock jurors rated the experts as high in credibility, they were more likely to choose more lenient sentences than when they rated the experts as low in credibility.;Female expert witnesses should utilize assertive response styles during their testimony, especially when the opposing expert witness is male. This may help to negate the disparity in credibility ratings between male and female experts, and make it less likely that the juror's sentencing recommendations will be affected by the male expert's views.
机译:研究表明,许多变量会影响专家证人的证词的说服力,例如专家的性别,案件的范围,专家的吸引力和专业水平(Cooper等人1996; Krauss&Sales,2001; Memon &Shuman,1998; Schuller,Terry,&Mckimmie,2001)。迄今为止,很少有调查研究专家性别,专家证人回应方式和律师质询方式对证人信誉等级,判决选择和量刑建议的影响。预计模拟陪审员的性别歧视将减轻专家的性行为和专家的证人反应方式对专家信誉等级的影响。结果表明,男性专家的证人比女性专家的证人更具亲和力和可信度。此外,当专家目击者以果断与防御的方式回答盘问时,他们被认为更加专业,讨人喜欢和可信。检察官使用侵入性质询不会影响专家的信誉等级,但会导致对律师的负面品格判断。专家的性别和专家的证人反应风格不会影响判决和量刑建议,模拟陪审团的性别歧视并不能缓解这些变量与专家信誉等级之间的关系。但是,专家的信誉等级与量刑建议显着相关。当模拟陪审员对专家的信任度很高时,他们比在专家对信誉的评价低时更倾向于选择宽大的句子;女专家证人在作证时应采用果断的回应方式,尤其是当反对的专家证人时是男的这可能有助于消除男性和女性专家之间信誉等级的差异,并减少陪审员的量刑建议受到男性专家意见影响的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Larson, Bridget Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Alabama.;
  • 学科 Law.;Speech Communication.;Sociology Criminology and Penology.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号