首页> 外文学位 >That glorious ancient history of our nation: The contested re -readings of 'Korea' in early Chinese historical records and their legacy on the formation of Korean -ness.
【24h】

That glorious ancient history of our nation: The contested re -readings of 'Korea' in early Chinese historical records and their legacy on the formation of Korean -ness.

机译:那个国家辉煌的古代历史:中国早期历史记录中对“韩国”的有争议的重读及其在朝鲜族形成中的遗产。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation addresses the contested re-readings of "Korea" in early Chinese historical records and their influence on the formation of Korean-ness in later periods. The earliest written records on "Koreans" are found in Chinese documents produced in the context of the Chinese world-view during the Han dynasty (3rd century BCE-3rd century CE). Since then, these early Chinese records have been used as primary sources for writing early Korean history in Korea, China and Japan. Later, reinterpretations and utilizations of these early records became more diverse. In particular, numerous new interpretations have emerged since the late 19th century, when the reconstruction of ancient history became a crucial part of the formation of Korean national consciousness.;The nation or nation-state came to be commonly used as a primary unit of historical narratives, and modern historiography of Korea was further complicated by a thirty-six-year colonial experience (1910--1945) under Japan. The Japanese colonial scholars attempted to depict the nature of Korean history as stagnant, heteronymous, and replete with factional strife throughout its historical eras. On the other hand, Korean nationalist historians strove to construct an indigenous Korean nation and make it as old as possible. By doing so, they hoped to mobilize Koreans' national consciousness in order to recover the political sovereignty that Japan had controlled since 1910. Although nationalistic historiography is still prevalent among historians all over the world, some scholars began to challenge the nation as the unit of historical writing from the 1980s. This challenge was firmly based on the argument that there are many disadvantages to viewing history from the single perspective of the nation or the nation-state.;People live with the legacies of the past, which makes history and memory crucial in the political, cultural and social aspects of human society. China, Japan and Korea have shared a long history of cultural interactions. It should be noted that neither similarities and continuities among East Asian civilizations, nor distinctions and discontinuities, can be disregarded in reaching a balanced, comprehensive understanding of culture and history in East Asia.
机译:本文论述了中国早期历史文献中对“韩国”的有争议的重读及其对后期朝鲜主义形成的影响。关于“朝鲜人”的最早书面记录可见于汉代(公元前3世纪至公元3世纪)在中国世界观背景下产生的中国文件。从那时起,这些早期中国记录被用作在韩国,中国和日本书写朝鲜早期历史的主要来源。后来,对这些早期记录的重新解释和利用变得更加多样化。特别是自19世纪末以来,当古代历史的重建成为朝鲜民族意识形成的关键部分时,出现了许多新的解释。民族或民族国家被普遍用作历史的主要单位由于在日本统治下的36年殖民历史(1910--1945年),韩国的叙述和现代史学进一步复杂化。日本殖民学者试图将朝鲜历史的本质描述为在整个历史时代中停滞,异质并且充满派系冲突。另一方面,韩国民族主义历史学家竭力建设一个土著朝鲜民族,并使其尽可能古老。通过这样做,他们希望动员朝鲜人的民族意识,以恢复日本自1910年以来所控制的政治主权。尽管民族主义史学在世界各地的历史学家中仍很普遍,但一些学者开始挑战以朝鲜为单位的民族。 1980年代的历史著作。这一挑战牢固地基于以下论点:从民族或民族国家的单一视角来看历史存在许多弊端。人们生活在过去的遗产中,这使得历史和记忆在政治,文化中至关重要和人类社会的社会方面。中国,日本和韩国有着悠久的文化互动历史。应该指出的是,在达成对东亚文化和历史的平衡,全面的了解时,不能忽略东亚文明之间的相似性和连续性,也不能忽略区别和不连续性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Xu, Stella Yingzi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 339 p.
  • 总页数 339
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号