首页> 外文学位 >Reciprocal transformative interactions between American academic culture and international scholars.
【24h】

Reciprocal transformative interactions between American academic culture and international scholars.

机译:美国学术文化与国际学者之间的相互转化互动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The culture of academe is a significant area of inquiry for researchers interested in the world of higher education. Kuh and Whitt (1988) point out that the importance of studying culture was emphasized, as, during the I 960s by various authors---including Becker, Geer, Hughes, and Strauss (1961), Feldman and Newcomb (1969), as well as Hefferlin (1969). The findings of numerous research studies led in time to the recognition of culture as a key concept for various fields of study, such as anthropology, sociology, social psychology, and communication sciences. Each of these disciplines sheds light on specific aspects of this complex phenomenon, which pervades all areas of social life and social interactions. The study of culture may substantially contribute to the clarification of less understood phenomena that occur in different social contexts. Thus it can offer coherent interpretations to actions, behaviors, and events that otherwise may seem to contradict logical predictions based on some superficial understanding of the particular social setting, or based on decontextualized generalizations. The present study used qualitative methods to examine the role played by the group of international scholars, members of academic communities on different types of American campuses, in the continuous shaping of institutional cultures. It also looked at the impact of American academic culture upon the ways in which these individuals learn to redefine their own identity. Consequently, the inquiry focused on particular experiences associated with the process of enculturation undergone by international scholars while becoming members of the academic profession in general, and members of various academic communities in particular. It also looked at the self-reported perceptions of international scholars concerning their culturally related influence within their campus communities. The theoretical framework of this study is the post-positivist naturalist paradigm and the grounded theory. Therefore the research used qualitative methods, analyzing data collected through semi-structured interviews with international scholars who are faculty members at American colleges and universities. The findings of the study produced a theoretical model for the development of the cultural dimension of personal identity. This model, entitled Transcending Cultural Boundaries, provides a framework for assessment and/or self-assessment of a person's cultural sensitivity.
机译:对于对高等教育世界感兴趣的研究人员,学术文化是一个重要的研究领域。 Kuh和Whitt(1988)指出,研究文化的重要性得到了强调,因为在960年代,包括贝克尔(Becker),盖尔(Geer),休斯(Hughes)和施特劳斯(Strauss),费尔德曼(Feldman)和纽科姆(Newcomb)(1969)在内的多位作者都强调说以及Hefferlin(1969)。大量研究的发现及时导致文化被认可为人类学,社会学,社会心理学和传播科学等各个研究领域的关键概念。这些学科中的每一个都阐明了这种复杂现象的具体方面,这种现象遍及社会生活和社会互动的所有领域。对文化的研究可能会大大有助于澄清在不同社会背景下发生的鲜为人知的现象。因此,它可以对动作,行为和事件提供连贯的解释,否则这些解释可能会基于对特定社会环境的一些肤浅理解或基于去上下文化的概括而与逻辑预测相矛盾。本研究使用定性方法研究了由国际学者组成的团体,不同类型美国校园中的学术团体成员在不断形成的制度文化中所起的作用。它还考察了美国学术文化对这些人学习重新定义自己的身份的方式的影响。因此,调查的重点是与国际学者在成为一般学术界成员,特别是各个学术界成员时所经历的与培养过程相关的特定经验。它还考察了国际学者关于他们在校园社区内与文化相关的影响的自我报告的看法。这项研究的理论框架是后实证主义的自然主义范式和扎根的理论。因此,该研究采用定性方法,对与美国高校教师的国际学者进行的半结构化访谈所收集的数据进行了分析。这项研究的结果为个人身份文化层面的发展提供了理论模型。这种名为“超越文化边界”的模型为评估和/或自我评估一个人的文化敏感性提供了一个框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    Culcer, Casandra M.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Toledo.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Toledo.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Developmental psychology.;Cultural anthropology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 187 p.
  • 总页数 187
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号