首页> 外文学位 >In-plane plane strain testing to evaluate formability of sheet steels used in tubular products.
【24h】

In-plane plane strain testing to evaluate formability of sheet steels used in tubular products.

机译:平面内应变测试,以评估用于管状产品的钢板的可成形性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In order to effectively and efficiently hydroform new automotive components, the formability of new tubular steels must be evaluated. Standard forming limit diagrams have been used for decades to evaluate and predict the formability of sheet steel formed along linear strain paths. However, tube hydroforming can present a problem since the pre-bending stage used in many hydroforming operations causes multiple non-linear strain paths.Three objective criteria were employed to evaluate and directly compare the formability of the four steels tested: difference in strain, difference in strain rate and local necking. The DDQ steel showed the highest formability followed in order by the HSLA, DP600 and DP780 steels. The repeatability in determining the forming limit strains using the difference in strain, the difference in strain rate and the local necking criteria for a 95% confidence interval was +/- 1.5%, +/- 1.2% and +/- 3.2% engineering strain, respectively.The forming limit data collected for this thesis has been compared to results from full-scale tube hydroforming operations and free expansion tube burst tests carried out by researchers at the University of Waterloo on the same four materials. It was found that local necking results could be used to predict failure of hydroformed HSLA steel tubes with low levels of end-feed. However, this same method could only predict the failure of hydroformed DP600 steel tubes at higher levels of end-feed. The three objective criteria were not found to be suitable for predicting failure of free expansion tube burst tests.This thesis has modified a formability test method that deforms small-scale sheet steel samples in a single plane. The sample geometries were designed such that the strain paths achieved at the center of the samples were very near the plane strain condition. The four steels chosen for this study were: a deep drawing quality (DDQ), a high strength low alloy (HSLA) and two dual phase steels (DP600 and DP780). The plane strain formability for each of the four steels was tested in both the rolling and transverse directions.
机译:为了有效和高效地液压成型新的汽车零部件,必须评估新的管状钢的可成形性。标准的成形极限图已经使用了数十年,以评估和预测沿线性应变路径形成的钢板的可成形性。但是,由于在许多液压成型操作中使用的预弯曲阶段会导致多个非线性应变路径,因此管状液压成型可能会出现问题。采用三个客观标准来评估和直接比较所测试的四种钢的可成形性:应变差异,差异应变率和局部颈缩。 DDQ钢表现出最高的可成型性,其次是HSLA,DP600和DP780钢。使用应变差,应变率差和95%置信区间的局部颈缩标准来确定成形极限应变的可重复性为+/- 1.5%,+ /-1.2%和+/- 3.2%工程应变本论文收集的成形极限数据已与滑铁卢大学研究人员对相同四种材料进行的全尺寸管液压成形操作和自由膨胀管爆裂试验的结果进行了比较。发现局部缩颈结果可用于预测低端进料量的液压成型HSLA钢管的失效。但是,这种相同的方法只能预测液压成型的DP600钢管在较高进给量下的失效。发现这三个客观标准不适用于预测自由膨胀管爆裂测试的失败。本文修改了一种可成形性测试方法,该方法可在单个平面上变形小尺寸钢板样本。设计样品的几何形状,使得在样品中心获得的应变路径非常接近平面应变条件。本研究选择的四种钢是:深冲质量(DDQ),高强度低合金(HSLA)和两种双相钢(DP600和DP780)。分别在轧制方向和横向方向上测试了四种钢中每种钢的平面应变成形性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kilfoil, Leo Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Mechanical.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 177 p.
  • 总页数 177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号