首页> 外文学位 >The rise of conservative think tanks: The debate over ideas, research and strategy in public education policy.
【24h】

The rise of conservative think tanks: The debate over ideas, research and strategy in public education policy.

机译:保守派智库的兴起:关于公共教育政策中的思想,研究和策略的辩论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research considers the rise of conservative think tanks in the United States over the past thirty years and explains their ability to insert themselves into education policy debates. Despite the rapid growth of think tanks and arguments made by scholars, politicians, and media about their increasing power, few case studies have been conducted on how think tanks actually exercise that power. This study is based on data drawn from a content analysis of think tank websites and publications; thirty-eight interviews with staff members of think tanks, advocacy organizations, and university based education policy institutes; and a media analysis using the LexisNexis® database. This dissertation argues that conservative thinks have served as institutions from which conservative ideas can be cultivated and expressed to the public and to policy makers. The growth in conservative think tanks and their education policy divisions has been a direct result of an elite policy planning network that sought to marginalize progressive policy consultants, schools of education, and academic research more generally. The parameters of education policy debates have largely been influenced by neoconservatives, business elites, and centrist Republicans and Democrats. These groups have successfully changed the education discourse away from an equity and access paradigm to one of accountability and standards. The most clear and significant finding of influence has been the representation of conservative think tanks in education topic media stories. This has occurred in spite of the fact that as a whole, these institutions produce little research and receive far less foundation funding for education projects than do centrist and liberal think tanks. The significance of this research speaks to the marginalization of academic researchers and brings into question a larger issue of the relevancy of applied social scientific research in today's political arena.
机译:这项研究考虑了过去三十年来美国保守派智囊团的崛起,并解释了其将自己纳入教育政策辩论的能力。尽管智库迅速增长,并且学者,政治家和媒体就其权力的提高提出了论点,但有关智库如何实际行使这种权力的案例研究却很少。本研究基于智囊团网站和出版物的内容分析得出的数据;对智囊团,宣传组织和大学教育政策机构的工作人员进行了38次采访;并使用LexisNexis®数据库进行媒体分析。本文认为,保守思想已经成为可以培养保守思想并向公众和决策者表达的制度。保守派智囊团及其教育政策部门的增长是精英政策计划网络的直接结果,该网络试图将进步政策顾问,教育学校和学术研究边缘化。新保守主义者,商界精英,中间派共和党人和民主党人很大程度上影响了教育政策辩论的内容。这些团体已经成功地将教育话语从公平和准入范式转变为问责制和标准之一。影响力最清晰,最有意义的发现是保守派智囊团在教育主题媒体故事中的代表。尽管事实上,与中心派和自由派智囊团相比,这些机构总体上开展的研究很少,并且为教育项目获得的基金会资金少得多,但这种情况还是发生了。这项研究的重要性说明了学术研究人员的边缘化,并提出了一个更大的问题,即在当今的政治舞台上应用社会科学研究的相关性。

著录项

  • 作者

    McDonald, Lauren E.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 223 p.
  • 总页数 223
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号