首页> 中文学位 >Housing Policy as a Communication-tool between Government and Masses A Case Study of Hangzhou and Delhi
【6h】

Housing Policy as a Communication-tool between Government and Masses A Case Study of Hangzhou and Delhi

代理获取

目录

声明

Acknowledgments

Abstract

Contents

List of Figures

List of Maps and Table

1.Introduction

2.Literature Review

2.1 Housing in China(Hangzhou)

2.2 Housing in India(Delhi)

2.3 Segregation and Communication in Housing Ecosystem of China and India

2.4 Housing and Communication

2.5 Gaps in the Literature

3.Theoretical Frameworks and Methodology

3.1 Theoretical Framework and Methodology Discussion

3.2 Research Instruments and Design

3.3 Research Questions

3.4 Hypothesis and Variables

3.5 Scope of Research

4.Survey based Case Study of Hangzhou and Delhi

4.1 Reasons of Selecting Hangzhou and Delhi

4.2 Hangzhou and Delhi:An Overview

4.3 An Introduction to Hangzhou

4.3.1 Relation with Suburban Counties and Land issues

4.3.2 Globalisation and Migrants and the City

4.4 An Introduction to Delhi

4.4.1 Caste,Migration and Delhiites

4.4.2 Infrastructure

4.5 Hangzhou and Delhi Housing:A Discussion

4.5.1 Housing in Expanding Delhi:People first-Roads last Model

4.5.2 Housing in Expanding Hangzhou:Roads first-People last Model

5.Statistical Data Analysis of Survey Results

5.1 Income,Gender,Family Size and Communication

5.2 Housing Size

5.3 Affordability Perceptions

5.4 Housing Price Change perception(2005-2015)

5.5 Role of Government in Housing Communication Ecosystem

5.6 Housing facilitating interaction

6.Conclusion:Finding,Limitations and Suggestion

References

Appendix

Brief Resume

展开▼

摘要

Unlike traditional forms of communication which depends on constant repetition and
  reassertion, housing policy can be a more potent and subtle medium for communication between government and the masses.And the impact housing has on shaping how the
  society evolves can have a critical influence on the rhetoric it caters to, the values it upholds and the future it aspires for.Historically and the more of it in contemporary times, housing is not only a minimum primary component of human beings life but also a major sector of economy that holds key to socio-economic growth and in turn overall development.Like other essential commodities, housing prices, if not kept under leash from real-estate market's fears, not only threatens long-term stable growth but one fundamental element of a common man's life goes out of bounds.On a planet where land is but a scarce resource, the demand for a holistic housing policy has such competing goals to achieve-all amid vested interests and widening concerns not limited to affordability and availability.It goes into the newer domains like environment, migrant and socio-cultural issues, and the need to institute all of it by creating and facilitating a pluralistic and tolerant society.The unstoppable trend of the modern world in favor of urbanization has led to complex challenges unimaginable until a few decades ago. Urbanization in the oriental societies and especially in countries like India and China with billion plus people to cater to is all the more intriguing.This paper breaks into the above intangible aspects by a comparative study of housing policy's communication to the many stakeholders of the housing ecosystem in two of the world's most ancient and contemporary cities of the world's fastest growing major economies: Hangzhou in China and Delhi in India.It achieves the same by primarily qualitative analysis of the linkages amid the ground stats, claims of policy makers, urban segregation and public images.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号