首页> 中文学位 >从消费者道德声誉视角来看基于品牌价格的农业产品伤害危机对消费者的影响——来自中国和斯里兰卡的比较分析
【6h】

从消费者道德声誉视角来看基于品牌价格的农业产品伤害危机对消费者的影响——来自中国和斯里兰卡的比较分析

代理获取

目录

声明

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

ABSTRACT

摘要

CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH OVERVIEW

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Definition and Meanings

1.2.1 Product harm crisis

1.2.2 Consumer Based Brand Equity

1.2.3 Causal Attributions

1.2.4 Consumers’ Moral reputation toward the Company

1.2.5 Consumers’ Moral Reputation toward the Brand

1.2.6 Perceived Societal Damage

1.2.7 Purchase Intention

1.2.8 Response Strategy

1.2.9 Corporate Social Responsibility

1.2.10 Culture/National culture/country

1.2.11 Celebrity endorser

1.2.12 Willingness to pay a price premium

1.2.13 Willingness to accept a price premium

1.2.14 Close friends

1.3 Study Background

1.4 Research Problem

1.5 Research Questions and Objectives

1.6 Purpose of the Study

1.7 Significance of the Study

1.7.1 Why does the study focus on consumers’ moral reputation?

1.7.2 Why does the study measure CBBE

1.7.3 Why does the study consider facets of CBBE in a product harm crisis?

1.7.4 Why does the study consider WTP/WTA in a product harm crisis?

1.7.5 Why does the study consider CBBE through consumers’ moral lens in a product harm crisis?

1.7.6 Why does the study consider company and brand separately?

1.7.7 Why does the study consider societal damage and gender?

1.7.8 Why does the study investigate consumer moral perceptions with respect to the causal dimensions of product harm crises?

1.7.9 Why does the study investigate the crisis response in a product harm crisis?

1.7.10 Why does the study investigate the CSR in a product harm crisis?

1.7.11 Why does the study investigate the celebrity endorsement in a product harm crisis?

1.7.12 Why does the study compare two countries?

1.7.13 Why does the study consider Asian countries?

1.7.14 Why does the study consider the effect of close friends on shaping consumer decisions in a product harm crisis?

1.8 Originality/Novelty of the study

1.9 Dissertation Overview

CHAPTER 2:UTERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Overview

2.2 Country,Gender,Societal Damage and Product Harm Crises

2.2.1 Product Harm Crises and National Culture

2.2.2.Product Harm Crises and Gender

2.2.3 Product Harm Crises and Perceived Societal Damage

2.2.4 Produet Harm Crises and Consumer Moral Reputation

2.3 Product Harm Crises and Consumer Based Brand Equity

2.3.1 Valuation of CBBE as a measure of consumer beliefs

2.3.2 Valuation of CBBE as a Financial Measure(WTP/WTA)

2.4 Causal Dimensions of Product Harm Crises,Consumers’ Moral Perceptions and CBBE

2.4.1 Internal,stable and controllable attributions (company culpable crisis) and consumer moral perceptions

2.4.2 External,unstable and uncontrollable attributions (consumer culpable crisis) and consumer moral perceptions

2.5 Company Response Strategies and Product Harm Crises

2.5.1 Voluntary Response Strategies and Product Harm Crises

2.5.2 Super Effort Response Strategies and Product Harm Crises

2.6 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Product Harm Crises

2.7 Product Harm Crises,Celebrity Endorsement and Negative Celebrity Publicity

2.7.1 Internal,Stable and Controllable Negative Celebrity Publicity

2.7.2 External,Unstable and Uncontrollable Negative Celebrity Publicity

2.8 Close Friends and Product Harm Crises

CHAPTER 3:RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Overview

3.2 Pretest(pilot study)

3.3 Research Methodology

3.3.1 Sample and procedure

3.3.2 Summary and the Rationale of the Procedure

3.3.3 Collection of Data

3.3.4 Variables and Measurements

3.3.5 Data Analyses Techniques

3.4 Technical Route

3.5 Summary

CHAPTER 4:EFFECT OF PRODUCT HARM CRISES ON CONSUMER BASED BRAND EQUITY

4.1 Overview

4.2 Sample Characteristics

4.3 The Effect of Product Harm Crises on the Facets of CBBE

4.3.1 Hypotheses Development and Research Model

4.3.2 Reliability,Validity Analysis and Manipulation Check

4.3.3 Hypotheses Test Results

4.3.4 Discussion

4.4 Consumers’ Valuation of CBBE as a Financial Measure (as a Measure of WTP/WTA)

4.4.1 Hypotheses Development and Research Model

4.4.2 Reliability,validity analysis and manipulation check

4.4.3 Hypotheses test results

4.4.4 Discussion

4.5 Summary

CHAPTER 5:CAUSAL DIMENSIONS OF PRODUCT HARM CRISES AND CONSUMERS’ MORAL REPUTATION

5.1 Overview

5.2 Research Model

5.3 Internal-Stable-Controllable (Company culpable) Product Harm Crises and CBBE

5.3.1 Hypotheses Development

5.3.2 Sample Characteristics

5.3.3 Reliability,Validity and Manipulation Check

5.3.4 Hypotheses Test Results

5.3.5 Discussion

5.4 External,Unstable,Uncontrollable (consumer culpable) Product Harm Crises and CBBE

5.4.1 Hypotheses Development

5.4.2 Sample Characteristics

5.4.3 Reliability,Validity and Manipulation Check

5.4.4 Hypotheses Test Results

5.4.5 Discussion

5.5 Comparison:Company culpable and consumer culpable crises

5.5.1 Hypotheses Development

5.5.2 Hypotheses Test Results

5.5.3 Discussion

5.6 Summary

CHAPTER 6:PRODUCT HARM CRISES AND CRISES RESPONSE

6.1 Overview

6.2 Hypotheses Development

6.3 Research Model

6.4 Voluntary Response Strategy and Product Harm Crises

6.4.1 Sample Characteristics

6.4.2 Reliability,Validity and Manipulation Check

6.4.3 Hypotheses Test Results

6.5 Super Effort Response Strategy and Product Harm Crises

6.5.1 Sample Characteristics

6.5.2 Reliability,Validity and Manipulation Check

6.5.3 Hypotheses Test Results

6.6 Comparison:Two Countries and two Crisis Response Strategies

6.7 Discussion

6.8 Summary

CHAPTER 7:CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY(CSR) AND PRODUCT HARM CRISES

7.1 Overview

7.2 Hypotheses Development

7.3 Research Model

7.4 Sample Characteristics

7.5 Reliability,Validity and Manipulation Check

7.6 Hypotheses Test Results

7.6.1 Does CSR really mitigate the negative impact of product harm crises?

7.6.2 Moderating role of CSR

7.7 Discussion

7.8 Summary

CHAPTER 8:CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT IN A PRODUCT HARM CRISIS

8.1 Overview

8.2 Hypotheses Development

8.2.1 Celebrity Endorsement and Purchase Intention

8.2.2 Causal Dimensions of Negative Celebrity Publicity and Moral Reputation

8.2.3 Moderating Role of Perceived Societal Damage

8.2.4 Moderating Role of Country

8.2.5 Moderating Role of Gender

8.2.6 Country,Negative Celebrity,MRCel,CBBE,and Purchase Intention

8.3 Research Model

8.4 Sample Characteristics

8.5 Reliability Validity and Manipulation Check

8.6 Hypotheses Test Results

8.6.1 Celebrity Endorsement and Purchase Intention

8.6.2 Causal Dimensions of Negative Celebrity Publicity and MRCel

8.6.3 Moderating Role of Perceived Societal Damage and Country

8.6.4 Moderating Role of Gender

8.6.5 MRCel,CBBE,and Pu rchase Intentions

8.7 Discussion

8.8 Summary

CHAPTER 9:INTERPERSONAL CONTACTS (CLOSE FRIENDS) AND PRODUCT HARM CRISES

9.1 Overview

9.2 Hypotheses Development

9.3 Research Model

9.4 Sample Characteristics

9.5 Validity and Reliability Analysis

9.6 Chinese and Sri Lankan Respondents’ View

9.6.1 Chinese Young Respondents’ View

9.6.2 Sri Lankan Young Respondents’ View

9.7 Discussion

9.8 Summary

CHAPTER 10:GENERAL DISCUSSION

10.1 Overview

10.2 The Effect of Product Harm Crises on CBBE

10.2.1 As a measure of consumer beliefs

10.2.2 As a financial measure

10.3 The Effect of Causal Dimensions of Product Harm Crises on Consumer Moral Reputation

10.4 The Effect of Crisis Response Strategies on Consumer Moral Reputation

10.5 The Effect of CSR Strategies on Consumer Moral Reputation

10.6 The Effect of Celebrity Endorsement on Consumer Moral Perceptions

10.7 The Effect of Close Friends on Purchase Intention of the Affected Brand

10.8 Summary

CHAPTER 11:CONCLUSIONS

11.1 Overview

11.2 Main Conclusions

11.3 Creativeness and Innovations

CHAFFER 12:THEORETICAL,MANAGERIAL AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

12.1 Overview

12.2 Theoretical Implications

12.3 Managerial Implications

12.4 Policy Implications

CHAPTER 13:LIMITATIONS AND WAY FORWARD

13.1 Overview

13.2 Main Limitations of the Study

13.3 Future Research

REFERENCES

APPENDIX A:QUESTIONNAIRE ENGLISH VERSION

APPENDIX B:QUESTIONNAIRE CHINESE VERSION

APPENDIX C:MAIN ASSUMPTIONS:LINEARITY,NORMALITY,AND OUTLIERS

APPENDIX D:DISSERTATION PUBLICATIONS

展开▼

摘要

在今天的商业世界里,产品伤害危机已经成为一个严重的问题因为它会给公司和品牌产生负面影响。产品伤害危机伦理本性和伦理情境下道德情感促使本文从一个新的实证角度研究这个问题。因此本研究的主要目的基于消费者道德声誉,从跨文化视角探讨产品伤害危机对基于消费者的品牌资产的影响(CBBE)。这是首次从亚洲消费者道德声誉角度调查产品伤害危机对基于消费者的品牌资产的影响的跨文化研究。除此之外,本研究验证了危机缓解策略对基于消费者的品牌资产的效应,以及在产品伤害情境下亲密朋友间的私人联系对改变消费者决定的作用.806位斯里兰卡学生和405位中国学生参加了本次实验。7套实验中的虚拟产品伤害情境通过控制组进行调查。研究通过消费者道德声誉的视角揭示了产品伤害危机对基于消费者的品牌资产的负面影响。研究展示了斯里兰卡消费者和中国消费者就产品伤害背景下反映的异同点。当中国和斯里兰卡的消费者基于他们的信仰来评价基于消费者的品牌资产时,他们的评价是不同的。比如,中国消费者的品牌态度反映了基于消费者的品牌资产的整个框架,而斯里兰卡消费者的品牌信任反映了基于消费者的品牌资产的整个框架。当通过行为来评价基于消费者品牌资产时,对比斯里兰卡消费者,中国消费者表现出更高支付意愿,更低的接受意愿,这也反映了两国的意识形态。然而,两国的男女都具有类似对涉事企业道德声誉。比如,对比女性,男性会展现出更高的支付意愿和更低的接受意愿。不论产品危机是企业的责任还是消费者的原因,它都会对消费者的道德声誉产生不利影响,对涉事企业的品牌资产和购买意愿造成伤害。值得注意的是中国和斯里兰卡在这些观念上的差异也揭示了两国的不同意识形态。对危机缓和策略有效性的调查得出了以下有趣的结论。中国消费者和斯里兰卡的消费者需要完全不同的回应策略。中国消费者需要自愿的回应策略,而斯里兰卡的消费者则需要更为努力对消费者考虑更多的策略。不合适的策略会导致经济和道德上的负面结果。就企业社会责任而言,中国消费者需要合法的企业社会责任,而斯里兰卡的消费者则需要合法合理合情的企业社会责任。两国都不太需要经济的企业社会责任。名人代言对两国消费者而言在产品伤害危机中都是一个有效手段。
  然而,在面对负面名人宣传时,与外部-不确定-不可控负面名人宣传相比,内部稳定可控的负面名人宣传会导致更低的道德声誉。民族文化和性别会显著影响消费者对负面名人的道德声誉。除此之外,本研究显示个人环境显著影响消费者在面对危机时的做出的决定。比如亲密的朋友会影响改变消费者在产品伤害危机情境下的购买意愿。总之,本研究通过消费者道德视角,揭示出产品伤害危机会对基于消费者品牌资产产生负面影响。民族文化和性别会显著影响消费者对涉事企业的道德声誉,从而形成基于消费者品牌资产。本文为企业提供了应对产品伤害危机的建议同时为将来的研究提供了借鉴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号