【24h】

A Comparison of Three MPI Implementations

机译:三种MPI实现的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Various implementations of MPI are becoming available as MPI is slowly emerging as the standard API for parallel programming on most platforms. The open source implementations LAM-MPI and MPICH are the most widely used, while commercial implementations are usually tied to special hardware platforms. This paper compares these two open-source MPI-implementations to one of the commercially available implementations, MESH-MPI from MESH-Technologies. We find that the commercial implementation is significantly faster than the open-source implementations, though LAM-MPI does come out on top in some benchmarks.
机译:随着MPI逐渐成为大多数平台上用于并行编程的标准API,MPI的各种实现已变得可用。开源实现LAM-MPI和MPICH被最广泛地使用,而商业实现通常与特殊的硬件平台相关。本文将这两种开放源代码的MPI实现与一种商用实现(MESH-Technologies的MESH-MPI)进行了比较。我们发现,尽管LAM-MPI在某些基准测试中确实名列前茅,但是商业实现比开放源代码实现要快得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号