【24h】

AERIAL SAFETY AS A MODEL OF UNEXPECTED SYSTEMIC EVOLUTION

机译:航空安全作为意外的系统进化模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Air safety has enjoyed in the past -until 1975- an impressive improvement rate; however, from that date, its improvement rate has been lagging. A big growth in the aerial traffic is forecasted and, consequently, keeping the present rate means also a growth in the number of accidents. However the current safety level could be evaluated as satisfactory, this forecast forces to recover urgently the lost learning capacity. The system, as a whole, improved strongly through technological and normative development; nevertheless, both ways of development can have reached its top as drivers to improvement. Potential improvements for safety have been diverted to the efficiency area and the complexity introduced in the system through its development can produce a situation where an accident is caused by the prevention strategy invented for the former one. Therefore, two fundamental issues deserve to be investigated: 1. Collateral effects of the development model based on technology and regulations. 2. Proposals to recover the learning capacity of the System. The ways that the system chose for its development seem to break some basic principles to keep its operative closure. Identifying these principles and the kind of effects they produce in the whole system can be a guide to get an improved learning capacity in the aerial safety field.
机译:过去(直到1975年),航空安全一直享有惊人的进步。但是,从那时起,它的改进率一直落后。预计空中交通量将大幅增长,因此,保持目前的速度也意味着事故数量的增加。然而,当前的安全水平可以被评估为令人满意,该预测迫使紧急恢复失去的学习能力。整个系统通过技术和规范发展得到了极大的改善;但是,两种发展方式都可以作为改进的动力。安全方面的潜在改进已转移到效率领域,并且由于系统的开发而引入的系统复杂性可能会导致一种情况,即为前者发明的预防策略会导致事故。因此,有两个基本问题值得研究:1.基于技术和法规的开发模型的附带影响。 2.关于恢复系统学习能力的建议。该系统为其发展选择的方式似乎打破了一些基本原则,以保持其有效的关闭。确定这些原理及其在整个系统中产生的影响的类型,可以作为在航空安全领域提高学习能力的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号