首页> 外文会议>World congress on intelligent transport systems;ITS America's annual meeting >A COMPARISON OF U.S. AND EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF U.S. AND EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES

机译:美欧合作体系架构的比较

获取原文

摘要

From the point of view of global producers, ITS products should be uniformly applicable toglobal needs and markets in order to maximize return on investment. Nonetheless, some ITSproduct categories, such as cooperative systems involving roadside infrastructure, must takeinto consideration local conditions, resulting in product variations. In the case of solutionsproposed for intersection collision avoidance, traffic signals, signal timing, communicationstechnologies, road markings, roadside infrastructure and driver behaviors may all differ fromcountry to country. This paper compares the U.S. CICAS-V and the European SAFESPOTprojects, and illustrates how their solutions are similar, where and why they differ, and howinternational standards in communications, message sets and data models are used, resultingin lower deployment costs for all.
机译:从全球生产商的角度来看,ITS产品应统一适用于全球需求和市场,以实现最大的投资回报。但是,某些ITS产品类别,例如涉及路边基础设施的合作系统,必须考虑当地条件,从而导致产品变化。在为避免交叉路口而提出的解决方案的情况下,各国之间的交通信号,信号定时,通信技术,道路标记,路边基础设施和驾驶员行为都可能有所不同。本文对美国CICAS-V项目和欧洲SAFESPOT项目进行了比较,并说明了它们的解决方案如何相似,为何不同以及为何不同,以及如何使用通信,消息集和数据​​模型的国际标准,从而降低了所有人的部署成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号