首页> 外文会议>User modeling, adaptation, and personalization >Contextual Slip and Prediction of Student Performance after Use of an Intelligent Tutor
【24h】

Contextual Slip and Prediction of Student Performance after Use of an Intelligent Tutor

机译:使用智能导师后的语境滑移和学生表现的预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Intelligent tutoring systems that utilize Bayesian Knowledge Tracing have achieved the ability to accurately predict student performance not only within the intelligent tutoring system, but on paper post-tests outside of the system. Recent work has suggested that contextual estimation of student guessing and slipping leads to better prediction within the tutoring software (Baker, Corbett, & Aleven, 2008a, 2008b). However, it is not yet clear whether this new variant on knowledge tracing is effective at predicting the latent student knowledge that leads to successful post-test performance. In this paper, we compare the Contextual-Guess-and-Slip variant on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing to classical four-parameter Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and the Individual Difference Weights variant of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (Corbett & Anderson, 1995), investigating how well each model variant predicts post-test performance. We also test other ways to utilize contextual estimation of slipping within the tutor in post-test prediction, and discuss hypotheses for why slipping during tutor use is a significant predictor of post-test performance, even after Bayesian Knowledge Tracing estimates are controlled for.
机译:利用贝叶斯知识追踪的智能补习系统不仅能够在智能补习系统内而且可以在系统外的纸质后测中准确预测学生的表现。最近的工作表明,对学生猜测和滑倒的情境估计可以在补习软件中提供更好的预测(Baker,Corbett和Aleven,2008a,2008b)。但是,尚不清楚这种关于知识追踪的新变体是否能有效预测导致成功的测验后表现的潜在学生知识。在本文中,我们将贝叶斯知识跟踪的上下文猜测和滑动变体与经典的四参数贝叶斯知识跟踪和贝叶斯知识跟踪的个体差异权重变体进行了比较(Corbett&Anderson,1995),研究了每种模型的效果如何变体可预测测试后的效果。我们还测试了在后期测试预测中利用导师内部滑移的上下文估计的其他方法,并讨论了即使在控制了贝叶斯知识跟踪估计后,为何在导师使用期间滑移是测试后表现的重要预测因子的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号