【24h】

Assessing the Health of Your QA Organization

机译:评估质量检查组织的运行状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aspiration of any software company or organization is the delivery of software products within defined goals of scope, and constraints of schedule and resources. The competitive nature of business requires that organizations live up to these goals, and work within these constraints, more effectively and efficiently over product lifecycle generations. What constitutes improving over time for a software QA organization varies depending on perspective: 1. For a tester it may mean more quickly differentiating between improper and expected behavior. 2. For a customer support analyst it may mean less issues found in the field. 3. For a test engineer it may mean optimizing test coverage based on risk assessment. 4. For a quality engineer it may mean identifying issues in earlier lifecycle phases. 5. For a QA manager it may mean making sure a quality/test team has the proper knowledge and tools in time to validate new technologies. 6. For a QA director it may mean doing more with less. The ability to consolidate so many perspectives into a comprehensive evaluation of improvement at the organization level is a complex challenge. A QA organization needs to regularly ask itself these questions: How do we know we are doing the right thing? How do we know we are improving over time? Realizing quantitatively whether your software QA organization lives up to the dynamic needs of your business is not as simple as looking at defect trends over time. An appropriate evaluation involves various aspects of a software QA function, including: operational behaviors, talent, customers, and budgets. This paper chronicles an approach taken by one software QA organization to evaluate its own health through establishing goals, benchmarking, defining organization-level metrics, and on-going self-assessment.
机译:任何软件公司或组织的愿望都是在定义的范围目标以及进度和资源约束下交付软件产品。业务的竞争性质要求组织在产品生命周期的各个阶段更加有效地实现这些目标,并在这些约束下工作。对于软件质量保证组织,随着时间的推移而构成的改进取决于不同的观点:1.对于测试人员,这可能意味着更快地区分不当行为和预期行为。 2.对于客户支持分析师而言,这可能意味着在现场发现的问题更少。 3.对于测试工程师,这可能意味着基于风险评估来优化测试范围。 4.对于质量工程师,这可能意味着在早期生命周期阶段中发现问题。 5.对于质量检查经理而言,这可能意味着确保质量/测试团队及时拥有适当的知识和工具来验证新技术。 6.对于质量检查主管,这可能意味着事半功倍。将这么多的观点整合到组织级别的全面改进评估中的能力是一项复杂的挑战。质量检查组织需要定期问自己以下问题:我们如何知道我们在做正确的事情?我们如何知道随着时间的推移我们正在改善?定量地了解您的软件质量检查组织是否能够满足业务的动态需求,并不像观察一段时间内的缺陷趋势那么简单。适当的评估涉及软件质量保证功能的各个方面,包括:操作行为,人才,客户和预算。本文介绍了一个软件质量检查组织通过建立目标,建立基准,定义组织级指标以及进行自我评估来评估自身健康的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号