【24h】

The Utah Paradigm, Bone, and Osteoporosis. A 1999 Overview

机译:犹他州范式,骨头和骨质疏松症。 1999年概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A) The still evolving Utah paradigm of skeletal physiology adds new ideas about the postnatal control of bone strength and "mass" in health and disease, on earth and in orbit, and in "osteoporosis". B) In tis view neuromuscular function and anatomy dominate control of the biologic mechanisms that control postnatal bone strength and "mass"; most nonmechanical agents could only help or hinder but not duplicate that control. C) That contrasts with long-held views of a 1960 paradigm that regulation of existing osteoblasts and osteoclasts by nonmechanical agents dominates control of bone strength and "mass", and that mechanical influences have little effect on those properties. D) The new paradigm suggests new kinds of osteoporoses, new criteria for diagnosing them, and new directions for their study, prevention and management. It also questions some former ideas about their pathogenesis, pathophysiology and management, so controversies arise that time and others must resolve. The controversies involve some matters that are crucial for success so they need resolution, burt this article does not try to resolved them. Instead it suggests some issues they could concern.
机译:A)犹他州不断发展的骨骼生理学范式为健康和疾病,地球和轨道以及“骨质疏松症”的骨骼强度和“质量”的产后控制提供了新的思路。 B)从神经肌肉功能和解剖学角度来看,控制出生后骨骼强度和“质量”的生物学机制占主导地位;大多数非机械因素只能帮助或阻碍但不能重复这种控制。 C)与长期以来对1960年范式的观点相反,后者认为非机械剂对现有成骨细胞和破骨细胞的调节支配着对骨强度和“质量”的控制,而机械影响对这些特性的影响很小。 D)新的范式提出了新型的骨质疏松症,诊断它们的新标准以及它们的研究,预防和管理的新方向。它还质疑一些有关其发病机理,病理生理学和治疗方法的先前观点,因此出现了时间争议,而另一些则必须解决。争议涉及一些对成功至关重要的事项,因此需要解决,本文不尝试解决这些问题。相反,它暗示了他们可能关注的一些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号