首页> 外文会议>Theory and Practice of Energetic Materials >Burning Rate Testing Techniques-A Comparative Study between Strand Burner and Ballistic Evaluation Motors
【24h】

Burning Rate Testing Techniques-A Comparative Study between Strand Burner and Ballistic Evaluation Motors

机译:燃烧率测试技术-钢绞线燃烧器与弹道评估电机的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper gives comparison between different burning rate testing techniques employed in propellant manufacturing industry. Commonly used techniques are strand burner and reduced scale rocket motors while other techniques are used for special applications. In general, small-scale motors (ballistic evaluation motors) are preferred to evaluate the burning rate of actual rocket motors while strand burner is used for quick assessment tests or quality control of large propellant production. Comparison and statistical analysis of burning rate of a HTPB based composite propellant having solid loading of around 86% was made. AP (Ammonium Perchlorate) was selected as oxidizer and Al (aluminum powder) as metallic fuel. Burning rate was measured at standard conditions by using strand burner technique and ballistic evaluation motors (BEM) for comparison of results. It was observed that burning rates obtained by both techniques are not same, and an increasing trend was observed from strand burner to ballistic evaluation motors.
机译:本文对推进剂制造行业采用的不同燃烧速率测试技术进行了比较。常用的技术是绞线燃烧器和小型火箭发动机,而其他技术则用于特殊应用。通常,首选小型电动机(弹道评估电动机)来评估实际火箭发动机的燃烧率,而线束燃烧器则用于快速评估测试或大型推进剂生产的质量控制。进行了固含量为86%左右的HTPB基复合推进剂燃烧速率的比较和统计分析。选择AP(高氯酸铵)作为氧化剂,选择Al(铝粉)作为金属燃料。通过使用线束燃烧器技术和弹道评估电机(BEM)在标准条件下测量燃烧速率,以比较结果。观察到,通过两种技术获得的燃烧速率不相同,并且观察到从线束燃烧器到弹道评估电动机的增加趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号