首页> 外文会议>The Internet of Things >Why Marketing Short Range Devices as Active Radio Frequency Identifiers Might Backfire
【24h】

Why Marketing Short Range Devices as Active Radio Frequency Identifiers Might Backfire

机译:为什么将短距离设备作为有源射频标识符销售可能会适得其反

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper analyses why marketing short range devices (SRD) as radio frequency identifiers (RFID) might backfire on the RFID industry. To support this claim it provides a legal use case as basis and gives an overview of selected technical parameters of RFID. Furthermore an analysis of 43 legal articles shows that legal experts perceive the technology of RFID in an undifferentiated way. Finally an analysis of 11 tag providers of so called "active RFID tags" shows that SRD are marketed as active RFID. It concludes that in order to avoid inhibiting legal consequences which might have negative effect on the RFID industry a differentiated approach regarding the functionality of short range transmitters and RFID is necessary.
机译:本文分析了为什么将作为射频识别器(RFID)的短程设备(SRD)推向市场可能会适得其反。为了支持该主张,它提供了一个法律用例作为依据,并概述了RFID的选定技术参数。此外,对43篇法律文章的分析表明,法律专家对RFID技术的理解是无差别的。最后,对11家所谓的“有源RFID标签”标签提供商的分析表明,SRD被作为有源RFID销售。结论是,为了避免抑制可能对RFID工业产生负面影响的法律后果,必须采用有关短程发射器和RFID功能的差异化方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号