【24h】

Why We Withdrew from Our First Forensics Case

机译:为什么我们退出第一个法医案件

获取原文

摘要

Work in the field of forensic human factors and biomechanics can be extremely difficult,especially for new professionals working on their first case. As such, it is not uncommonfor new experts to take any case that they are retained on, regardless of the feasibility ofthe requests made of them. It is important, however, to maintain scientific and intellectualintegrity on such cases, not only to establish a positive professional reputation but to ensurethat future work in the field remains feasible. This paper addresses three central factors forwithdrawal considerations (case facts, attorney-expert communications, and interprofessionalinteractions) that are illustrated using an example case in which a bridgecollapse resulted in personal injury. The experts chose to withdraw from the case when theclient attorney was unable to provide crucial data and materials that were promised at timeof retention.
机译:法医人为因素和生物力学领域的工作可能非常困难, 特别是对于处理第一个案件的新专业人员。因此,这并不少见 让新专家承担保留他们的任何情况,无论 他们提出的要求。然而,重要的是要保持科学和知识 在这种情况下保持诚信,不仅可以建立良好的职业声誉,还可以确保 该领域的未来工作仍然可行。本文针对以下三个主要因素 退出注意事项(案例事实,律师-专家交流和专业间 互动),其中使用了一个示例案例,其中一个网桥 崩溃导致人身伤害。专家选择撤回案件时, 客户律师无法提供当时承诺的关键数据和材料 保留率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号