首页> 外文会议>The art of foundation engineering practice >Combination of O-cell test and conventional head-down test
【24h】

Combination of O-cell test and conventional head-down test

机译:O电池测试和常规的向下测试的结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

O-cell tests were performed in Singapore on four bored piles in a residual soil and underlying weathered, highly fractured bedrock called the Bukit Timah Granite formation. Two of the piles were 1.2 m diameter, uninstrumented, and 28 m and 38 m long. The other two were strain-gage instrumented, 1.0 m diameter piles, both 37 m long. The latter tests combined the O-cell test with conventional head-down testing. Analysis of the test results indicated that the pile toe stiffness was low. The evaluation of the strain-gage data showed that the pile material modulus was a function of the induced strain. The desired axial working load was 10 MN, and the combined O-cell and head-down tests correlated to a head-down test with a maximum applied load of 38 MN, which, although smaller than the ultimate resistance of the piles, was taken as the capacity of piles constructed similar to the second set of test piles at the site.
机译:在新加坡,在残余土壤和潜在风化的,高度破裂的基岩中的四个钻孔桩上进行了O单元测试,这些基岩被称为Bukit Timah花岗岩地层。其中两个桩的直径为1.2 m,无仪表,长度分别为28 m和38 m。另外两个是应变计仪器,直径为1.0 m,长度均为37 m。后面的测试将O电池测试与常规的平视测试结合起来。测试结果分析表明,桩趾刚度较低。应变计数据的评估表明,桩的材料模量是诱发应变的函数。所需的轴向工作载荷为10 MN,并且将O型电池和向下测试的组合与最大施加载荷为38 MN的向下测试相关联,尽管该测试载荷小于桩的极限阻力因为建造的桩的能力类似于现场的第二组测试桩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号