首页> 外文会议>Symposium on Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology VI, Nov 26-30, 2001, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. >New Approaches to the Characterization of Obsidian from the Mediterranean Island Sources: Interpreting Chronological Change in Neolithic Sardinia and Corsica
【24h】

New Approaches to the Characterization of Obsidian from the Mediterranean Island Sources: Interpreting Chronological Change in Neolithic Sardinia and Corsica

机译:表征地中海黑曜石来源的黑曜石的新方法:解释新石器时代的撒丁岛和可西嘉岛的年代变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Geochemical fingerprinting of obsidian sources was first applied in the Mediterranean region nearly four decades ago. Since then, a number of analytical methods (e.g. INAA, XRF, SEM/Microprobe, ICP-MS) have proven successful in distinguishing the Mediterranean island sources of Giali, Lipari, Melos, Palmarola, Pantelleria, and Sardinia. Moreover, recent geoarchaeological surveys of the central Mediterranean sources have resulted in the more precise location and documentation of each obsidian flow or outcrop, and multiple chemical groups have been identified on at least three of the islands. The ability to specifically attribute artifacts to one of at least five obsidian flows in the Monte Arci region of Sardinia, for example, has enabled the study of specific patterns of source exploitation and the trade mechanisms which resulted in the distribution of obsidian hundreds of kilometers away during the Neolithic period (ca. 6000-3000 BC). Results are presented here from the chemical analysis of 186 artifacts from several sites in Sardinia and Corsica as part of the largest and most comprehensive study of obsidian sources and trade in the Mediterranean. Analyses of large numbers of artifacts demonstrate the differential use of island subsources, which may be attributed to factors such as access (e.g. topography, distance from coast), size and frequency of nodules, and mechanical and visual properties. The patterns of source exploitation revealed by this study specifically support a down-the-line model of obsidian trade during the neolithic period. In addition, the spatial and chronological patterns of obsidian distribution may be used to address such issues as the colonization of the islands; the introduction of neolithic economies; and the increasing social complexity of neolithic and bronze age societies in the central Mediterranean.
机译:黑曜石来源的地球化学指纹图谱在近四十年前首次在地中海地区应用。从那时起,许多分析方法(例如,INAA,XRF,SEM / Microprobe,ICP-MS)被证明可以成功地区分地中海上的贾利亚,利帕里,梅洛斯,帕尔马罗拉,潘泰莱里亚和撒丁岛。此外,最近对地中海中部资源的地质考古调查导致每个黑曜石流或露头的位置和记录更加精确,并且至少在三个岛屿上已鉴定出多个化学族。例如,能够将特质归因于撒丁岛蒙特阿奇地区至少五种黑曜石流中的一种,使得能够研究特定的资源开采模式和贸易机制,从而导致数百公里外黑曜石的分布在新石器时代(约公元前6000-3000年)。这里是对撒丁岛和科西嘉岛多个地点的186件文物的化学分析的结果,这是对地中海黑曜石来源和贸易的最大,最全面的研究的一部分。对大量文物的分析表明,岛上子源的使用差异很大,这可能归因于诸如出入(例如地形,距海岸的距离),结节的大小和频率以及机械和视觉特性等因素。这项研究揭示的资源开发模式特别支持了新石器时代的黑曜石贸易线下模型。此外,黑曜石分布的空间和时间顺序可以用来解决诸如岛屿殖民化等问题。引入新石器时代的经济;以及地中海中部新石器时代和青铜时代的社会日益复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号