【24h】

Disjunction Under Deontic Modals: Experimental Data

机译:道义模态下的析取:实验数据

获取原文

摘要

The meaning components of may/or and must/or sentences have been discussed intensively by a number of theoretical accounts. The debates are concerned with whether free choice inferences are part of logical meaning or scalar implicatures, and additionally, whether exhaustive inferences and exclusive or inferences are derived for may/or versus must/or. In this study, two experiments were conducted for the purpose of evaluating the assumptions of three representative accounts, namely, Fox [10], Geurts [12] and Simons [20]. Each experiment separately examined the availability and processing time-course of the three types of inferences associated with may/or versus must/or sentences. The experimental results fit Simons's [20] analysis to a large extent.
机译:可能的和/或必须的/或句子的含义组成部分已通过许多理论解释进行了深入讨论。辩论关注的是自由选择推理是逻辑含义还是标量含义的一部分,此外,还涉及是否针对可能/或与必须/或得出详尽的推理和排他性或推理。在这项研究中,进行了两个实验,以评估三个代表性帐户的假设,即Fox [10],Geurts [12]和Simons [20]。每个实验分别检查与may / or vs / must / or句子相关的三种类型推论的可用性和处理时程。实验结果在很大程度上符合西蒙斯[20]的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号