首页> 外文会议>SPIE Medical Imaging Conference >Detecting Multiple Myeloma via Generalized Multiple-Instance Learning
【24h】

Detecting Multiple Myeloma via Generalized Multiple-Instance Learning

机译:通过广义多实例学习检测多发性骨髓瘤

获取原文

摘要

We address the task of automatic detection of lesions caused by multiple myeloma (MM) in femurs or other long bones from CT data. Such detection is already an important part of the multiple myeloma diagnosis and staging. However, it is so far performed mostly manually, which is very time consuming. We formulate the detection as a multiple instance learning (MIL) problem, where instances are grouped into bags and only bag labels are available. In our case, instances are regions in the image and bags correspond to images. This has the advantage of requiring only subject-level annotation (ground truth), which is much easier to get than voxel-level manual segmentation. We consider a generalization of the standard MIL formulation where we introduce a threshold on the number of required positive instances in positive bags. This corresponds better to the classification procedure used by the radiology experts and is more robust with respect to false positive instances. We extend several existing MIL algorithms to solve the generalized case by estimating the threshold during learning. We compare the proposed methods with the baseline method on a dataset of 220 subjects. We show that the generalized MIL formulation outperforms standard MIL methods for this task. For the task of distinguishing between healthy controls and MM patients with infiltrations, our best method makes almost no mistakes with a mean AUC of 0.982 and F_1 = 0.965. We outperform the baseline method significantly in all conducted experiments.
机译:我们解决了根据CT数据自动检测股骨或其他长骨中的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)引起的病变的任务。这种检测已经是多发性骨髓瘤诊断和分期的重要组成部分。但是,到目前为止,它主要是手动执行的,这非常耗时。我们将检测公式化为多实例学习(MIL)问题,其中实例被分组到包中,并且只有包标签可用。在我们的案例中,实例是图像中的区域,袋子对应于图像。这样做的好处是只需要主题级别的注释(基本事实),比体素级别的手动分割要容易得多。我们考虑标准MIL公式的一般化,在此我们引入了阳性袋中所需阳性实例数的阈值。这更好地对应于放射学专家所使用的分类程序,并且对于假阳性实例更稳定。我们扩展了几种现有的MIL算法,通过估计学习期间的阈值来解决一般情况。我们在220个主题的数据集上比较了所提出的方法和基线方法。我们证明,对于该任务,广义MIL配方优于标准MIL方法。为了区分健康对照组和MM浸润患者,我们的最佳方法几乎没有错误,平均AUC为0.982,F_1 = 0.965。在所有进行的实验中,我们明显优于基准方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号