【24h】

Authenticity: New Personas for Digital Media

机译:真实性:数字媒体的新角色

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This panel approaches the problem of authenticity as the concept is evolvingrnthrough technological practices. Most debates surrounding this evolutionrnhave proceeded from a naturalized definition of authenticity. This definition isrnlargely founded on the printed word tradition and the principle thatrnfaithfulness to the written word is paramount, while stylistic modifications tornthe form of documents are acceptable.This naturalized definition can be problematized using two different axes: (1)rnfrom textual to non-textual (e.g., audio-visual) documents; (2) from paper tornelectronic media. In the first case, there are no general and stable conventionsrnfor distinguishing content from its formal manifestation. In the second case,rnthe only stable measure of authenticity, that of bitwise integrity, (a) is toornrestrictive to deal with the inevitable logical format migrations that must occurrnfor digital media to remain accessible; and (b) does not measure how thernrendering process of the bitstream (e.g., on screen, on paper) conforms to therncontent of the document.rnThe papers in this panel will explore how new electronic documentaryrnpractices challenge the naturalized definition of authenticity, and chart howrnconcepts of authenticity evolve in conjunction with such practices. The papersrnwill suggest how new rules and conventions for defining authenticity mayrnemerge in given areas of documentary practices - digitized medievalrnmanuscripts, electronic contracts, XML-encoded documents - or fromrnmultidisciplinary research efforts.
机译:由于该概念正在通过技术实践发展,因此该小组讨论了真实性问题。围绕这种演变的大多数争论都是从对真实性的自然定义开始的。该定义主要建立在印刷字的传统和原则上,即对文字的忠实至上是最重要的,而对文档格式的样式修改是可以接受的。可以使用两个不同的轴来质疑该归化的定义:(1)从文本到非文本(例如视听)文件; (2)从纸上撕毁电子媒体。在第一种情况下,没有用于区分内容与其形式表现形式的通用且稳定的约定。在第二种情况下,唯一可靠的可靠性度量是按位完整性度量(a)在处理不可避免的逻辑格式迁移方面是受限制的,必须进行这种迁移才能使数字媒体保持可访问性; (b)无法衡量比特流的渲染过程(例如,在屏幕上,在纸上)如何符合文档的内容。该小组中的论文将探讨新的电子文档实践如何挑战真实性的真实性定义,并绘制概念图真实性的结合就是这种实践。这些论文将建议在特定的文献实践领域(数字化的中世纪手稿,电子合同,XML编码的文件)或来自多学科研究的努力中,如何出现用于定义真实性的新规则和惯例。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Charlotte NC(US);Charlotte NC(US)
  • 作者单位

    Department of Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles,rn218 GSEIS Building, Box 951520, Los Angeles, California 90005-1520.rnblanchette@ucla.edu;

    Université de Technologie de Compiègne Institut National d'Audiovisuel,rnDirection de la recherche et de l'expérimentation, Institut National dernl'Audiovisuel, 4, avenue de l'Europe, 94366 Bry sur marne Cedex, France.rnbruno.bachimont@utc.fr;

    InterPARES Project, School of Library, Archival, and Information Studies,rnUniversity of British Columbia, Suite 301-6190 Agronomy Road, Vancouver,rnBC V6T 1Z3, Canada.rnbonnie.mak@ubc.ca;

    Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences de l'Information et desrnBibliothèques, 17-21 avenue du 11 Novembre 1918, 69623 VilleurbannernCedex, France.rnsalaun@enssib.fr;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号