首页> 外文会议>Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE);SPIE Proceedings >New Approach to Breast Cancer CAD using Partial Least Squares and Kernel-Partial Least Squares
【24h】

New Approach to Breast Cancer CAD using Partial Least Squares and Kernel-Partial Least Squares

机译:使用偏最小二乘和核偏最小二乘的乳腺癌CAD新方法

获取原文

摘要

Breast cancer is second only to lung cancer as a tumor-related cause of death in women. Currently, the method of choicefor the early detection of breast cancer is mammography. While sensitive to the detection of breast cancer, its positivepredictive value (PPV) is low, resulting in biopsies that are only 15-34% likely to reveal malignancy. This paperexplores the use of two novel approaches called Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Kernel-PLS (K-PLS) to the diagnosis ofbreast cancer. The approach is based on optimization for the partial least squares (PLS) algorithm for linear regressionand the K-PLS algorithm for non-linear regression. Preliminary results show that both the PLS and K-PLS paradigmsachieved comparable results with three separate support vector learning machines (SVLMs), where these SVLMs wereknown to have been trained to a global minimum. That is, the average performance of the three separate SVLMs wereAz = 0.9167927, with an average partial Az (Az90) = 0.5684283. These results compare favorably with the K-PLSparadigm, which obtained an Az = 0.907 and partial Az = 0.6123. The PLS paradigm provided comparable results.Secondly, both the K-PLS and PLS paradigms out performed the ANN in that the Az index improved by about 14%(Az ≅ 0.907 compared to the ANN Az of ≅ 0.8). The “Press R squared” value for the PLS and K-PLS machine learningalgorithms were 0.89 and 0.9, respectively, which is in good agreement with the other MOP values.
机译:乳腺癌是女性中与肿瘤相关的死亡原因,仅次于肺癌。当前,乳腺癌的早期检测的选择方法是乳房X线照相术。尽管对乳腺癌的检测很敏感,但其阳性预测值(PPV)较低,导致活检显示恶性的可能性仅为15-34%。本文探讨了使用两种称为偏最小二乘(PLS)和核仁-PLS(K-PLS)的新颖方法来诊断乳腺癌。该方法基于用于线性回归的偏最小二乘(PLS)算法和用于非线性回归的K-PLS算法的优化。初步结果表明,PLS和K-PLS范例在三个单独的支持向量学习机(SVLM)上均达到了可比的结果,其中已知这些SVLM已被训练到最低限度。也就是说,三个独立的SVLM的平均性能为Az = 0.9167927,平均局部Az(Az90)= 0.5684283。这些结果与K-PLS范式相当,后者的Az = 0.907,部分Az = 0.6123。 PLS范式提供了可比较的结果。其次,K-PLS和PLS范式都执行了ANN,因为Az指数提高了约14%(Az≅0.907,而ANN Az≅0.8)。 PLS和K-PLS机器学习算法的“ Press R平方”值分别为0.89和0.9,与其他MOP值非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号