首页> 外文会议>The Sixth international symposium on software reliability engineering >Analysis of Review's Effectiveness Based on Software Metrics
【24h】

Analysis of Review's Effectiveness Based on Software Metrics

机译:基于软件指标的评论有效性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper statistically analyzes the relationship between review and software quality and the relationship between review and productivity, utilizing software metrics on actual 36 projects executed in OM-RON Corporation from 1992 to 1994.rnFirstly, by examining the relationship between review effort and field quality (the number of faults after delivery) of each project, and the relationship between the number of faults detected in review and field quality of each project, we reasoned that;rn(1) Greater review effort helps to increase field quality (decrease the number of faults after delivery).rn(2) Source code review is more effective in order to increase field quality than design review.rn(3) If more than 10% of total design and programming effort is spent on review, one can achieve a quite stable field quality.rnSecondly, we examined that no relevant effects were recognized in productivity (LOC/staff-month) with respect to review rate of up to 20%.rnAs a result of analysis above, we recommended that 15% of review effort is a suitable percentage to use as a guideline for our software project management.
机译:本文利用OM-RON公司1992年至1994年执行的实际36个项目的软件指标,对审查与软件质量之间的关系以及审查与生产率之间的关系进行了统计分析。我们认为(rn)(1)加大审查力度有助于提高现场质量(减少故障的数量)(减少交付的故障数量)和每个项目的现场质量之间的关系。 (2)为了提高现场质量,源代码审阅比设计审阅更有效。rn(3)如果将总设计和编程工作的10%以上用于审阅,则可以达到相当的效果。稳定的田间质量。rn其次,我们检查了生产率(LOC /工作人员月数)方面的任何相关影响均未得到认可,复审率高达20%。rn e,我们建议15%的审查工作量适合作为我们软件项目管理的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号