首页> 外文会议>Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 2006 >Comparison of Two MDA Algorithms for a Problem in Missile Defense
【24h】

Comparison of Two MDA Algorithms for a Problem in Missile Defense

机译:导弹防御问题中两种MDA算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we compare the performance of two Multidimensional Assignment Algorithms (MDA), the La-grangean Relaxation based 5-D algorithm and the Sequential m-best 2-D algorithm, applied to a realistic problem in missile defense surveillance. The benchmark problem consists of a set of sources that provide "event" (track) estimates of multiple launches, via a number of communication networks to a Fusion Center (FC) which has to perform data association prior to fusion. The network model used "loses" the information tag that distinguishes reports from the same source transmitted through different networks, i.e., the track identity (ID) assigned by the source is not passed on. Only a track ID assigned by the network, and the source ID accompany the track. Thus detection and elimination of track duplications at the FC is needed. The proposed hierarchical approach to the problem requires the solution of several MDA problems before calculating the fused estimate, so accuracy of the solution of each is crucial. Examples with several launches, sources and networks are presented to compare the performance of the two assignment algorithms.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了两种多维分配算法(MDA),基于拉格兰奇松弛算法的5-D算法和顺序m-最佳2-D算法在导弹防御监视中的现实问题的性能。基准测试问题由一组来源组成,这些来源通过多个通信网络向必须在融合之前执行数据关联的融合中心(FC)提供多次发射的“事件”(跟踪)估计。使用的网络模型“丢失”了将报告与通过不同网络传输的同一来源的报告区分开的信息标签,即,未传递由该来源分配的跟踪标识(ID)。该网络仅伴随网络分配的轨道ID和源ID。因此,需要在FC处检测和消除轨道重复。针对该问题提出的分层方法需要在计算融合估计之前解决几个MDA问题,因此每个解决方案的准确性至关重要。给出了带有多个发射,源和网络的示例,以比较两种分配算法的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号