首页> 外文会议>The Seventh Wuhan International Conference on E-Business: Unlocking the Full Potential of Global Technology >Is Performance Driven by Industry Effects or Firm Effects? —An Empirical Research On the Listed Companies in China by Variance Components Analysis
【24h】

Is Performance Driven by Industry Effects or Firm Effects? —An Empirical Research On the Listed Companies in China by Variance Components Analysis

机译:绩效是受行业影响还是企业影响驱动? -基于方差成分分析的中国上市公司实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the strategic management theory, the structure-based view holds that the structural characteristic of industry is the main determinant of firm performance; while the resource-based view claims that the competitive advantage is driven by firm’s resource and capacity. Foreign researches indicate that firm effects are greater than industry effects mostly. In this paper, we carry out an empirical research on 1070 listed companies’performance in 20 industries by variance components analysis, and the findings are different from previous researches: (1) in China, the industry factors have notable effect on short-term payoff of the listed companies, (2) industry effects are the main determinants of short-term payoff of the listed companies, but firms’ resource and capacities are the dominant determinants of firm values and development potential; (3)the performance of firms in the middle of industry are mainly caused by industry effects, but the performance of firms which are performance leaders and losers in the industry are mainly caused by firom’ resource and capacities.
机译:在战略管理理论中,基于结构的观点认为,产业的结构特征是企业绩效的主要决定因素。基于资源的观点则声称竞争优势是由公司的资源和能力驱动的。国外研究表明,企业效应大多大于行业效应。本文通过方差成分分析对1070家上市公司在20个行业中的绩效进行了实证研究,其发现与以往的研究不同:(1)在中国,行业因素对短期收益有显着影响。在上市公司中,(2)行业影响是上市公司短期收益的主要决定因素,而公司的资源和能力是决定公司价值和发展潜力的主要决定因素; (3)产业中间企业的绩效主要是由产业效应引起的,而作为产业绩效领导者和失败者的企业的绩效则主要是由长期的资源和能力引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号