Getting Back in Front -Time for a Step Change in Engagement Practices

摘要

The extractive industries response to community engagement due to social and political pressures in the 1980s and 1990s was the starting point of development leading to the modern function of corporate social responsibility. Challenged by communities who have greater access to information, demand greater transparency and responsibility of corporate organisations and who possess greater awareness of the communities they participate in, the mining sector faces another step change in how it approaches and integrates corporate social responsibility, transparency and engagement. Mining is seeking reserves of lower grades, in more sensitive environments and in countries with minimal transparency and governance. Not only are the locations changing but so to the stakeholders to engage with and issues to contend with. An increasingly savvy opposition, including not just the 'green hippies' but the Gen-Ys interested in the wider sustainability debate and Baby Boomers moving to life style environments, are now questioning mining's behaviour and encroachment into 'their space'. Issues including effect on lifestyle amenity, property value, energy efficiency, social provision; concepts such as 'doing more with less', participatory engagement, increasing transparency and balancing economic, environment, cultural and social aspects are becoming the norm. The traditional model of supporting local communities, communicating plans and providing employment, community investment and indigenous support programs is not enough. Our industry faces challenges on multiple fronts. It must now be able to address these from a personal/ community perspective if it is to remain relevant within communities and play a role in addressing the global sustainability issues. This paper draws on corporate social responsibility trends, integrated functions and implementation approaches through the application of activities within Newmont operations across Asia Pacific. The approach presented works on the philosophy that communities do not necessarily have to like what we do, but should be able to identify and recognise the way in which we involve them in decision making, communicate our intentions and respond to issues.