【24h】

Biofuels for Europe: Which Ones Fit Best? - A Comparative Analysis for the Community

机译:欧洲的生物燃料:哪个最适合? -社区比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Early comprehensive life cycle assessments (LCAs) that compared biofuels with fossil fuels appeared in the beginning of the nineties. Since then the number of assessed parameters has continuously increased and the methodology improved. One of the most extensive studies on this topic was completed in 2000. A large variety of ecological parameters was examined over the whole life cycles by using a unified methodical approach on a high level of differentiation. The results of this study allow an overall evaluation of the ecological advantages and disadvantages of the substitution of certain fossil fuels by biofuels in accordance with the methodological demands on LCAs. Special emphasis was put on the interpretation. Based on the determination of the "specific contributions" and the ecological importance of the various evaluated parameters, the final evaluation shows that under specific assumptions the use of certain biofuels has definite environmental advantages compared to fossil fuels.
机译:在90年代初出现了将生物燃料与化石燃料进行比较的早期综合生命周期评估(LCA)。从那时起,评估参数的数量不断增加,方法学也得到了改善。关于此主题的最广泛的研究之一于2000年完成。通过使用统一的方法论方法,对高水平的分化进行了研究,研究了整个生命周期中的各种生态参数。这项研究的结果可以根据对LCAs的方法学要求,全面评估用生物燃料替代某些化石燃料的生态利弊。特别强调了解释。根据确定的“特定贡献”和各种评估参数的生态重要性,最终评估表明,在特定假设下,与化石燃料相比,某些生物燃料的使用具有明显的环境优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号