首页> 外文会议>Remote sensing and hydrology. >Comparison of ET from two remote sensing-based surface energy models in south central Nebraska
【24h】

Comparison of ET from two remote sensing-based surface energy models in south central Nebraska

机译:内布拉斯加州中南部两个基于遥感的表面能模型中ET的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quantification of crop water use through evapotranspiration (ET) is very important for water resources management and irrigation scheduling. Two energy balance approaches were applied to estimate ET in south central Nebraska: (1) Mapping EvapoTranspiration at high Resolution with Internal Calibration (METRIC), and (2) Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEB) model. While both use remotely sensed thermal data for estimating ET, the METRIC is much more complex than the SSEB and widely used in the USA. Both ET models use the hot and cold pixel approach for scaling ET between driest and wettest pixels within an agricultural setting. Four Landsat 5 and four Landsat 7 images acquired for the 2007 growing season over path 29/row 32 were used to produce instantaneous ET. Images were selected with the least cloud cover and distributed temporally to cover different crop growth stages. ET data measured with a Bowen ratio energy balance system was used to assess the estimated ET accuracy. Statistical comparison of estimated daily ET against observed data gave an r~2 of 0.73 and 0.66 for METRIC and SSEB, respectively. Both models produced the same root mean square error of 1.5 mm/d or 35% of the observed average daily ET. However, statistical comparison between METRIC and SSEB-based ET gave an r2 of 0.96, indicating that SSEB performance is comparable to METRIC. Considering the minimal amount of ancillary data required for implementation and excellent performance in predicting daily ET, the SSEB approach is a promising tool for mapping ET.
机译:通过蒸散量(ET)量化作物用水对水资源管理和灌溉计划非常重要。内布拉斯加州中南部采用了两种能量平衡方法来估算ET:(1)通过内部校准(METRIC)绘制高分辨率的蒸发蒸腾图,以及(2)简化的表面能量平衡(SSEB)模型。虽然两者都使用遥感的热数据估算ET,但METRIC比SSEB复杂得多,在美国已广泛使用。两种ET模型都使用热像素和冷像素方法在农业环境中的最干燥像素和最湿像素之间缩放ET。使用2007年生长季节在第29 /行32路径上获取的四张Landsat 5和四张Landsat 7图像生成瞬时ET。选择的图像云量最少,并按时间分布以覆盖不同的作物生长阶段。用Bowen比率能量平衡系统测量的ET数据用于评估估计的ET准确性。估计每日ET与观测数据的统计比较得出METRIC和SSEB的r〜2分别为0.73和0.66。两种模型均产生1.5 mm / d的均方根误差,即观察到的每日平均ET的35%。但是,METRIC和基于SSEB的ET之间的统计比较得出r2为0.96,这表明SSEB的性能与METRIC相当。考虑到实施所需的最少辅助数据量以及预测每日ET的出色性能,SSEB方法是绘制ET的有前途的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号