【24h】

Assessing satellite based PM2.5 estimates against CMAQ model forecasts

机译:根据CMAQ模型预测评估基于卫星的PM2.5估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this work, we focus on estimations of fine particulate matter using MODIS AOD as part of a neural network scheme and compare this to both simple linear regressions and GEOS-CHEM products. In making this comparison, it is well known the seasonal and geographical dependences observed in the PM2.5-AOD relationship; thus, to enhance our predictions, we apply WRF PBL information to our neural network method and assess its performance. As part of our analysis, we first explore the baseline effectiveness of AOD and PBL as strong factors in estimating PM2.5 in a local experiment using data collected at one site in New York City. Then, we expand our analysis to a regional domain where daily estimations are obtained based on site location and season. In our local test, we find the high efficiency of the neural network estimations when AOD, PBL and seasonality are primarily assessed (R~0.94 in summer). Later, we test our regional network and compare it with the GEOS-CHEM PM2.5 product. From this, we see better estimations from our experiment using urbanon-urban stations and applying different spatial schemes for training the neural network (R_(NN)~0.80, R_(GEOS-CHEM)~0.57 in an urban station with a distance radius of 0.1 degree; R_(NN)~0.74, R_(GEOS-CHEM) ~0.69 in a non-urban station with a distance radius of 0.3 degree). Finally, we create regional daily PM2.5 maps and compare them to GEOS-CHEM outputs, evaluating the corresponding estimations using ground readings.
机译:在这项工作中,我们专注于使用MODIS AOD作为神经网络方案的一部分来估算细颗粒物,并将其与简单的线性回归和GEOS-CHEM产品进行比较。在进行这种比较时,众所周知的是,在PM2.5-AOD关系中观察到季节和地理依赖性。因此,为了增强我们的预测,我们将WRF PBL信息应用于神经网络方法并评估其性能。作为我们分析的一部分,我们首先使用在纽约市一个地点收集的数据,探讨AOD和PBL的基线有效性,这些基线有效性是评估本地实验中PM2.5的重要因素。然后,我们将分析扩展到一个区域范围,在该区域范围内,根据站点位置和季节获得每日估算值。在我们的本地测试中,我们发现,当主要评估AOD,PBL和季节性(夏季R〜0.94)时,神经网络估计效率很高。稍后,我们测试我们的区域网络,并将其与GEOS-CHEM PM2.5产品进行比较。从中我们可以看到,使用城市/非城市站点的实验和采用不同空间方案训练距离较远的城市站点的神经网络(R_(NN)〜0.80,R_(GEOS-CHEM)〜0.57)的更好估计。半径为0.1度;在非城市站点(半径为0.3度)中,R_(NN)〜0.74,R_(GEOS-CHEM)〜0.69)。最后,我们创建区域每日PM2.5地图,并将其与GEOS-CHEM输出进行比较,并使用地面读数评估相应的估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号