首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere >Assessing satellite based PM2.5 estimates against CMAQ model forecasts
【24h】

Assessing satellite based PM2.5 estimates against CMAQ model forecasts

机译:基于卫星的PM2.5对CMAQ模型预测的估算

获取原文

摘要

In this work, we focus on estimations of fine particulate matter using MODIS AOD as part of a neural network scheme and compare this to both simple linear regressions and GEOS-CHEM products. In making this comparison it is well known the seasonal and geographical dependences observed in the PM2.5-AOD relationship; thus, to enhance our predictions, we apply WRF PBL information to our neural network method and assess its performance. As part of our analysis, we first explore the baseline effectiveness of AOD and PBL as strong factors in estimating PM2.5 in a local experiment using data collected at one site in New York City. Then, we expand our analysis to a regional domain where daily estimations are obtained based on site location and season. In our local test, we find the high efficiency of the neural network estimations when AOD, PBL and seasonality are primarily assessed (R~0.94 in summer). Later, we test our regional network and compare it with the GEOS-CHEM PM2.5 product. From this, we see better estimations from our experiment using urban/non-urban stations and applying different spatial schemes for training the neural network (R_(NN)~0.80, R_(GEOS-CHEM)~0.57 in an urban station with a distance radius of 0.1 degree; R_(NN)~0.74, R_(GEOS-CHEM)~0.69 in a non-urban station with a distance radius of 0.3 degree). Finally, we create regional daily PM2.5 maps and compare them to GEOS-CHEM outputs, evaluating the corresponding estimations using ground readings.
机译:在这项工作中,我们专注于使用MODIS AOD作为神经网络方案的一部分的细颗粒物质的估计,并将其与简单的线性回归和Geos-Chem产品进行比较。在使比较方面,众所周知,在PM2.5-AOD关系中观察到的季节性和地理依赖性;因此,为了增强我们的预测,我们将WRF PBL信息应用于我们的神经网络方法并评估其性能。作为我们分析的一部分,我们首先探讨AOD和PBL的基线有效性,以在纽约市的一个站点中收集的数据估算PM2.5在局部实验中的强因素。然后,我们将我们的分析扩展到区域域,其中基于现场位置和季节获得日常估计。在我们当地的测试中,我们在主要评估AOD,PBL和季节性时发现神经网络估计的高效率(夏季R〜0.94)。后来,我们测试我们的区域网络并将其与Geos-Chem PM2.5产品进行比较。从这一点中,我们看到我们的实验中使用城市/非城市站点进行了更好的估计,并应用了不同的空间方案来训练神经网络(R_(NN)〜0.80,R_(Geos-Chem)〜0.57在一个城市站中的距离半径为0.1度; R_(NN)〜0.74,R_(Geos-Chem)〜0.69在非城市站中,距离半径为0.3度)。最后,我们创建了区域每日PM2.5地图,并将它们与Geos-Chem输出进行比较,评估使用地面读数的相应估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号