首页> 外文会议>Recent Researches in Business Administration, Finance and Product Management >THE OPPOSITION BETWEEN HISTORIC COST AND FAIR VALUE IN NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING
【24h】

THE OPPOSITION BETWEEN HISTORIC COST AND FAIR VALUE IN NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING

机译:历史成本和公允价值在国家和欧洲会计中的对立

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historic costs' evaluation consists in registering goods in-comings into the company's patrimony at their buying cost, namely their historic cost, with no further modification although the real value changes. Fair value is the foundation of IFRS referential which displays basic principles, largely inspired by US GAAP, although they are not mentioned by them. The issues that occur refer to the impact of the evaluation according to the fair value upon the accounting data of the company, namely upon the balance sheet and the results account drawn out on the basis of the fair value registrations. At the same time, the evaluation according to the fair value has determined a new foundation in displaying a company's performance. This issue determines the following question: "Which is closer to the truth and more credible? A result calculated according to the fair value or one which is founded upon historic cost?"
机译:历史成本的评估包括以购买成本(即历史成本)将进入公司的商品收入注册到公司的遗产中,尽管实际价值发生变化,但无需进行进一步修改。公允价值是IFRS参考标准的基础,该参考标准显示了受美国GAAP启发的基本原则,尽管并未提及。发生的问题是指根据公允价值进行评估对公司会计数据的影响,即对资产负债表和根据公允价值注册得出的结果帐户的影响。同时,根据公允价值进行的评估为展示公司绩效奠定了新的基础。这个问题决定了以下问题:“哪个更接近真理,更可信?根据公允价值计算的结果还是基于历史成本得出的结果?”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号