首页> 外文会议>Progress on post-genome technologies and modern natural products >EFFICIENCY COMPARISON OF THREE NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION KITS FOR EXTRACTING BLOOD VIRUS
【24h】

EFFICIENCY COMPARISON OF THREE NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION KITS FOR EXTRACTING BLOOD VIRUS

机译:三种核酸提取试剂盒提取血液病毒的效率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To compare the efficiency of different nucleic acid extraction kits for extracting blood virus. 3 commonly used kits for extraction of blood viral nucleic acid were chosen from domestic and international markets, including OMEGA kit, QIAGEN kit and WATSON kit. The nucleic acid extraction procedures were carried out according to the instructions of the 3 kits and the real-time quantitative PCR was performed for quantitative analysis. OMEGA kit had the best extraction efficiency of DNA but had the worst extraction efficiency for RNA extraction within a short time and at medium cost QIAGEN kit had good efficiency for both DNA and RNA extraction with medium term, but at the highest cost; WATSON kit had medium efficiency rate for both DNA and RNA extraction with long term extraction and at the lowest cost. For the sample with unknown capacity and category of virus, QIAGEN kit should be the first, priority and followed by WATSON kit WATSON kit should be the first choice in terms of cost.
机译:比较不同核酸提取试剂盒提取血液病毒的效率。从国内外市场上选择了3种常用的提取血液病毒核酸的试剂盒,包括OMEGA试剂盒,QIAGEN试剂盒和WATSON试剂盒。根据3种试剂盒的说明书进行核酸提取程序,并进行实时定量PCR以进行定量分析。 OMEGA试剂盒具有最佳的DNA提取效率,但短时间内的RNA提取效率却最差,而中等成本的QIAGEN试剂盒具有中期的DNA和RNA提取效率,但成本最高; WATSON试剂盒对DNA和RNA的提取均具有中等效率,可长期提取且成本最低。对于未知容量和病毒类别的样品,就成本而言,应首先选择QIAGEN试剂盒,其次是WIASON试剂盒,其次是WATSON试剂盒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号