首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the thirty-second annual meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute >A COMPARISON OF AUDITORS' GOING CONCERN OPINIONS AND TWO DIFFERENT BANKRUPTCY MODELS: AN ANALYSIS OF U.S. TRADE AND SERVICE INDUSTRY FAILURES 1974-1988.
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF AUDITORS' GOING CONCERN OPINIONS AND TWO DIFFERENT BANKRUPTCY MODELS: AN ANALYSIS OF U.S. TRADE AND SERVICE INDUSTRY FAILURES 1974-1988.

机译:审计师考虑的建议和两种不同的破产模式的比较:对1974-1988年美国贸易和服务业失败的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study reconsiders the efficacy of auditors' opinions in comparison to two bankruptcy predictionrnmodels in light of the current crisis facing the auditing profession. We compare bankruptcy predictionsrnfor two very different bankruptcy models against the auditors' going concern opinions for a group ofrnbankrupt firms in the US. Firstly, predictions are made using Altman's (1968) Multiple DiscriminantrnAnalysis (MDA) model that includes only financial ratio variables in its formulation and secondly, usingrna temporal logit model by Cybinski (1998, 2000) that also includes explicit factors of the businessrncycles. The results show better bankruptcy classification rates for the temporal model than for thernAltman model and audit opinions.
机译:鉴于当前审计行业面临的危机,本研究与两种破产预测模型相比,重新考虑了审计师意见的有效性。我们将针对两种截然不同的破产模型的破产预测与美国一组破产企业的审计师的持续经营意见进行比较。首先,使用Altman(1968)的多重判别分析(MDA)模型进行预测,该模型仅在公式中包含财务比率变量,其次,使用Cybinski(1998,2000)的时态logit模型,其中也包含了商业周期的显式因素。结果表明,时间模型的破产分类率比rnAltman模型和审计意见更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号