首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 53rd ASIS annual meeting(ASIS'90) >AN INVESTIGATION INTO SELF-QUESTIONING BEHAVIOR DURING PROBLEM-SOLVING
【24h】

AN INVESTIGATION INTO SELF-QUESTIONING BEHAVIOR DURING PROBLEM-SOLVING

机译:解决问题过程中的自问问题行为的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this research was to investigate self-questioning behavior within the context of a problem-solving situation in order to better understand the user's handling of his/her information need. An experiment was designed to yield data to test the hypothesis that problem-solving activity is reflected as successful and unsuccessful questioning behavior. Two different behaviors in questioning emerged to support the hypothesis.rnThe basic underlying assumptions for this study are that question generation arises from an information need and that questioning is a behavioral act to satisfy that need.rnThe specific hypothesis is: Self-questioning behavior in a problem situation reveals successful and unsuccessful problem-solving strategies.rnCorollary is: Solvers and non-solvers exhibit differing self-questioning strategies.rnThis investigation found information need to be different for solvers and non-solvers and that this difference was revealed through self-questioning strategies.rnThe findings clearly delineated between solvers and non-solvers. Conventional statistical treatment of the scores on the number of questions generated supported the assumption of equal means: a surface or first level effect as it turned out to be. The correlation treatment, however, was able to demonstrate two different behaviors specifically lexical from the syntax: a second level effect. These specific question formulations when treated semantically through content analysis revealed underlying differences in the questioning strategies: a third level effect.
机译:这项研究的目的是在解决问题的情况下调查自我提问的行为,以便更好地了解用户对他/她的信息需求的处理。设计了一个实验来产生数据,以测试解决问题的活动反映为成功和不成功的提问行为的假设。质疑中出现了两种不同的行为来支持该假设。这项研究的基本假设是,问题的产生来自信息需求,而质疑是满足这一需求的行为。特定的假设是:自我质疑行为问题情境揭示了成功和不成功的解决问题的策略。rn推论是:求解者和非解决者展现出不同的自我提问策略。rn该调查发现,解决者和非解决者所需要的信息是不同的,并且这种差异是通过自我提问来揭示的该结果清楚地描述了求解器和非求解器。对生成的问题数量的分数进行常规的统计处理,支持了均值均等的假设:事实证明是表面效应或一级效应。但是,相关性处理能够从语法上证明两种不同的行为,特别是词汇上的行为:第二层效果。通过内容分析在语义上对待这些特定的问题表述,揭示了提问策略的根本差异:第三层效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号