首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Revisiting IP QoS >What QoS research hasn't understood about risk
【24h】

What QoS research hasn't understood about risk

机译:QoS研究尚未了解有关风险的知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In an effort to meet application needs, network researchers have designed internet quality of service (QoS) architectures intended to deliver end-to-end performance guarantees to applications. Because such services offer guarantees and must elevate and isolate select traffic from competing traffic, we refer to them as "elevated services" (this is in contrast to forms of QoS that differentiate two or more best-effort service classes none of which is strictly elevated over another [3]). Despite two decades of vigorous research and standards activity, elevated services have failed to deploy. We argue that a fundamental reason for this failure is a confusion between QoS as an underlying technology and QoS as a service offering. Neither customers nor Internet service providers need or want hard performance guarantees. Instead, each wants tools to understand and manage risk.
机译:为了满足应用程序需求,网络研究人员设计了Internet服务质量(QoS)架构,旨在为应用程序提供端到端的性能保证。由于此类服务提供保证,并且必须将某些流量与竞争流量进行提升和隔离,因此我们将其称为“提升服务”(这与区分两种或更多种尽力而为服务的QoS形式形成了对比没有一个课程比另一个课程严格提升[3])。尽管经过二十年的积极研究和标准活动,但高级服务未能部署。我们认为此失败的根本原因是作为基础技术的QoS与作为服务产品的QoS之间的混淆。客户和Internet服务提供商都不需要或不希望获得硬性能保证。相反,每个人都需要工具来理解和管理风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号