【24h】

Managing Pesticide Residue Issues in International Trade of Agro Products from an Industrial Food Chain Perspective

机译:从工业食品链的角度管理农产品国际贸易中的农药残留问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Pesticide residues in agricultural products are a major consideration during international trade by various industries involving food production, trade, processing and distribution, due to concerns of the potential adverse effects on human health. In fact, if used appropriately, pesticide residues should not be a cause for health concern because rigorous regulatory processes ensure scientific risk assessment of agrichemicals before they are approved for any use. Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) or Tolerances are established, as the maximum concentration of pesticide residue likely to occur in or on food after the use of pesticides according to Good Agricultural Practice (GAP). MRLs are established mainly to monitor whether GAPs are followed and to assist international trade in importing and exporting produce treated with pesticides. Exceeding MRLs does not imply hazards to human health. Although much effort has been put to facilitate international trade by establishing internationally harmonized MRLs (Codex MRLs), some countries/regions still use their own national or regional MRLs, which are quite often very different across the globe. Trade issues may arise when the import and export countries/regions monitor under different MRLs, thus MRL violations in the imported goods. In addition, more stringent compliance rules along the food chain sometimes demand even lower pesticide residues in foods. Therefore, measures should be taken to prevent and tackle potential residue issues in foods in international trade, to reduce economic conflict and loss. From the government perspective, harmonized MRLs and implementation of the harmonized MRLs for most pesticides would be ideal. From the industry perspective, some measures can be recommended to prevent and resolve issues, which include, but not limited to: 1) Follow GAP strictly and no off-label uses; 2) Have a clear understanding of residue regulations (including analytical technology) and food chain requirements in the import country/region in advance; 3) Compare the GAPs, MRLs and residue data of import and export countries/regions, to project potential issues; 4) Residue inspection before export; and 5) Apply for import MRLs. Additionally, residue decline trials, innovative formulations and delivery system, label warning and other type of communications may also help with preventing and dealing with issues associated with pesticide residues in foods. From the academic perspective, education and training may be implemented on residue science to regulators and the public to avoid misunderstanding and interpretation of food residues.
机译:农产品中的农药残留是涉及食品生产,贸易,加工和分配的各行各业在国际贸易中的主要考虑因素,这是由于担心对人体健康的潜在不利影响。实际上,如果适当使用农药残留,就不会引起健康问题,因为严格的监管程序可确保在批准将其用于任何用途之前对农药进行科学的风险评估。建立了最大残留限量(MRL)或容许量,因为根据良好农业规范(GAP),使用农药后食品中或食品上可能出现的农药残留最大浓度。建立最大残留限量主要是为了监测是否遵守了GAP,并协助国际贸易进出口经过农药处理的农产品。超过最大残留限量并不意味着危害人类健康。尽管已通过建立国际统一的最大残留限量(Codex MRLs)来促进国际贸易,但是一些国家/地区仍使用其自己的国家或地区最大残留限量,在全球范围内通常存在很大差异。当进出口国家/地区根据不同的最大残留限量进行监管时,可能会出现贸易问题,从而导致进口商品中出现最大残留限量。此外,整个食物链上更严格的合规性规则有时要求食物中的农药残留更低。因此,应采取措施预防和解决国际贸易中食品中潜在的残留问题,以减少经济冲突和损失。从政府角度来看,统一农药残留最大残留限量和对大多数农药实施统一农药最大残留限量将是理想的。从行业的角度来看,可以建议采取一些措施来预防和解决问题,包括但不限于:1)严格遵守GAP原则,并且不使用非标签使用; 2)事先对进口国/地区的残留法规(包括分析技术)和食物链要求有清晰的了解; 3)比较进出口国家/地区的GAP,MRL和残留数据,以预测潜在问题; 4)出口前的残留检验; 5)申请进口MRL。此外,残留物减少试验,创新的配方和输送系统,标签警告以及其他类型的交流也可能有助于预防和处理与食品中农药残留有关的问题。从学术角度来看,可以对监管机构和公众进行有关残渣科学的教育和培训,以避免对食品残渣的误解和解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号