首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of The 38th IPA convention and exhibition-Strengthening Partnership to Enhance Indonesia’s Energy Resilience and Global Competitiveness >FACIES ANALYSIS, ROCK TYPE, AND PROPERTY DISTRIBUTION IN UPPER INTERVAL OF BATURAJA FORMATION, KRISNA FIELD, SUNDA BASIN
【24h】

FACIES ANALYSIS, ROCK TYPE, AND PROPERTY DISTRIBUTION IN UPPER INTERVAL OF BATURAJA FORMATION, KRISNA FIELD, SUNDA BASIN

机译:松达盆地克里斯纳油田巴图拉贾组上部层段上段相分析,岩石类型及性质分布

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Krisna Field is located in the western part of thernoffshore Southeast Sumatra (SES) Block, in thernSunda Basin. The field, which is managed by thernCentral Business Unit, SES Block, produces oilrnfrom carbonate reservoirs within the BaturajarnFormation, with the main production coming fromrnthe upper interval (UBR).rnProduction plots and water injection data show thatrnthere are problems associated with reservoirrnheterogenity and conectivity. It therefore becamernessential to undertake the task of reservoirrncharactertization in order to address these problemsrnand gain an understanding and establish a rationalernfor forward direction to achieve maximum recoveryrnefficiency. It is the objective of this study to identifyrnlithofacies and facies associations and characterizernthe distributions of rock type, porosity andrnpermeability.rnThin section petrographic analysis of core samplesrnfrom Krisna D-04 and Krisna E-02 wells show thatrnthere are five lithofacies: foraminifera shale,rnplanktonic foraminifera packstone, skeletalrnwackestone, skeletal packstone, and benthicrnforaminifera packstone. The carbonate reservoirrnwas previously interpreted as a reef complex.rnHowever, lithofacies and seismic attribute (meanrnamplitude) analysis indicate two facies associationsrnare present, skeletal mound and slope to basin.rnRock type (RT) identification using Pore GeometryrnStructure was used as an indicator of reservoirrnheterogeneity. This resulted in the identification ofrnsix RT’s, each with specific porosity andrnpermeability trends, unrelated to lithofacies, butrncorrelated to pore types and sizes. The six rock types are: RT1 associated withrninterparticle-moldic micropores, RT2 associatedrnwith interparticle mesopores, RT3 associated withrninterparticle-moldic mesopores, RT4 associatedrnwith interparticle-moldic macropores, RT5rnassociated with vuggy-moldic macropores, and RT6rnassociated with vuggy-channeling.rnUsing a stochastic methodolgy it was possible tornshow that rock type distribution in the skeletalrnmound facies association controlled porosity andrnpermeability distribution. The study determined thatrnrock type, porosity, and permeability distributionrnare the main factors controlling heterogenity andrnconectivity in the UBR reservoir. The study resultsrnwill be used as the main input to a dynamicrnsimulation for water injection and furtherrndevelopment planning in Krisna Field.
机译:克里斯纳油田位于瑟恩达盆地的瑟南海岸苏门答腊(SES)区块的西部。该油田由SES区块的中央业务部门管理,从Baturajarn组内的碳酸盐岩储层中开采石油,主要产量来自上层井段(UBR)。生产图和注水数据表明,存在与储层非均质性和连通性有关的问题。因此,有必要进行储层特征化的任务,以解决这些问题并获得理解并建立合理的前进方向,以实现最大的采收率。这项研究的目的是识别岩相和岩相的关联以及岩石类型,孔隙度和渗透率的分布特征。薄壁岩相分析Krisna D-04和Krisna E-02井的岩心样品显示,有五个岩相:有孔虫页岩,浮游有孔虫碎石,骨架碎石,骨架碎石和底栖有孔虫碎石。碳酸盐岩储集层以前被解释为礁岩复合体。然而,岩相和地震属性(幅度)分析表明存在两个相的关联,即骨架丘和盆地坡度。利用孔隙几何结构识别岩型(RT)被用作储层非均质性的指标。这样就确定了rnsix RT,每种都具有特定的孔隙率和渗透率趋势,与岩相无关,而与孔隙类型和大小相关。六种岩石类型分别是:RT1与颗粒间-分子微孔相关联,RT2与颗粒间-分子中孔相关联,RT3与颗粒间-分子大孔相关联,RT5与卵泡-分子大孔相关联,RT6与卵泡状通道相关的RT6。可能撕裂表明,在骨架相相中的岩石类型分布控制着孔隙度和渗透率分布。研究确定,岩石类型,孔隙度和渗透率分布是控制UBR储层非均质性和连通性的主要因素。研究结果将用作Krisna油田注水和进一步开发规划动态模拟的主要输入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号