首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on design of communication. >A Cognitive Perspective on Developer Comprehension of Software Design Documentation
【24h】

A Cognitive Perspective on Developer Comprehension of Software Design Documentation

机译:对开发人员理解软件设计文档的认知观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Software design documentation is an important aid for communication during software development and maintenance. Nevertheless, little empirical evidence exists regarding the use of software documentation, and effective software design representation in particular. In an experimental setting, we used documentation from industry in which aspects of a software design were modeled in both a (UML) diagram and text. We recorded and analysed how participants used these media to answer various design-related questions and collected additional information in various questionnaires. By having participants think aloud, we set out to understand the underlying cognitive processes of developer design comprehension by applying the grounded theory method. We validated the results with concepts from the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Results show a positive correlation between developer certainty and correctness of answers, whereas the opposite was not found. Also, self-rated experience and self-mted skill coincide with higher levels of certainty. We found that participants rated information based on perceived importance and that their "common sense" plays a significant, role. Surprisingly, more than 60 percent of the answers were based on the consultation of a single medium. These results clearly ask for further investigation. We propose corresponding future work.
机译:软件设计文档是在软件开发和维护期间进行通信的重要帮助。然而,关于软件文档的使用,尤其是有效的软件设计表示,几乎没有经验证据。在实验环境中,我们使用了来自行业的文档,其中以(UML)图表和文本对软件设计的各个方面进行了建模。我们记录并分析了参与者如何使用这些媒体回答与设计有关的各种问题,并在各种调查表中收集了其他信息。通过让参与者大声思考,我们着手运用扎根的理论方法来理解开发人员设计理解的潜在认知过程。我们用多媒体学习的认知理论中的概念验证了结果。结果显示开发人员的确定性和答案的正确性之间存在正相关,而未发现相反的结果。同样,自我评价的经验和自我评价的技能与更高的确定性水平相吻合。我们发现,参与者根据感知到的重要性对信息进行评分,并且他们的“常识”扮演着重要的角色。令人惊讶的是,超过60%的答案是基于单一媒体的咨询。这些结果显然要求进一步调查。我们建议相应的未来工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号