【24h】

Can social contagion spread without key players?

机译:没有主要参与者,社会传染病能否传播?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Contagion models have been used to study the spread of social behavior among agents of a population, such as information diffusion, social influence, and participation to collective action (e.g., protests). Key players, which are typically high-degree, -k-core or -centrality agents in a networked population, are considered important for spreading social contagions. In this paper, we ask whether contagions can propagate through a population that is void of key players. We use Erdos-Renyi random graphs as a representation of unstructured populations that lack key players, and investigate whether complex contagions - those requiring reinforcement - can spread on them. We demonstrate that two game-theoretic contagion models that utilize common knowledge for collective action can readily spread such contagions, which is a significant difference from classic complex contagion models. We compare contagion dynamics results on unstructured networks to those on more typically-studied, structured social networks to understand the role of network structure. We test a total of 14 networks. The two common knowledge models are also contrasted to understand the effects of different modeling assumptions on dynamics. We show that under a wide range of conditions, these two models produce markedly different results.
机译:传染模型已被用来研究社会行为在人口主体之间的传播,例如信息传播,社会影响和参与集体行动(例如,抗议)。关键参与者通常是网络人口中的高级,k核心或中央代理,被认为对传播社会传染很重要。在本文中,我们询问传染病是否可以通过没有关键参与者的人群传播。我们使用Erdos-Renyi随机图来表示缺乏关键参与者的非结构化人口,并研究复杂的传染病(需要加强的传染病)是否可以在其上传播。我们证明了两个利用理论知识进行集体行动的博弈理论传染模型可以很容易地传播此类传染,这与经典的复杂传染模型有显着差异。我们将非结构化网络上的传染动力学结果与更常研究的结构化社交网络上的传染动力学结果进行比较,以了解网络结构的作用。我们总共测试了14个网络。还对比了这两个常识模型,以了解不同建模假设对动力学的影响。我们表明,在广泛的条件下,这两个模型产生明显不同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号