【24h】

Game Theory Analysis of ADR Used in Construction Industry

机译:建筑业ADR的博弈分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the rapid development of Chinese construction industry, there are increasing disputes between project participants, due to the causes of poor quality, cost overrun, payments, etc. And many of them later become legal issues. The traditional legal settlement had showed great limitations for lengthy process and complexity. The industrial professionals strongly demand in introducing diversity resolution for the reason of efficiency. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which is considered to replace legal settlement, has been widely adopted in international environment for base of governance structure and function description. The aim of this paper is to explore the mechanism of ADR model by game theory. The primary conclusion shows I that the ADR is neither a zero-sum game nor a positive-sum game but a positive-but-variable game structure. It will also provide strategies for each party in achieving fast dispute settlement
机译:在中国建筑业的飞速发展中,由于质量低下,成本超支,付款等原因,项目参与方之间的争端越来越多。许多争端后来成为法律问题。传统的法律解决方案对于冗长的过程和复杂性显示出很大的局限性。由于效率的原因,工业专业人员强烈要求引入多样性解决方案。替代性纠纷解决方案(ADR)被认为是替代法律解决方案,在国际环境中已被广泛采用,作为治理结构和职能描述的基础。本文的目的是通过博弈论探讨ADR模型的机理。主要结论表明,ADR既不是零和博弈也不是正和博弈,而是一种正向但可变的博弈结构。它还将为各方提供战略,以实现快速纠纷解决

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号