首页> 外文会议>POWER-GEN Europe 2005 >STEPS TOWARDS THE MINIMISATIONOF CO2 EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIREDPOWER PLANTS
【24h】

STEPS TOWARDS THE MINIMISATIONOF CO2 EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIREDPOWER PLANTS

机译:迈向最小化燃煤电厂二氧化碳排放的步骤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

On the one hand and due to its unfavourable C/H ratio causes coal the highest specific CO2rnemissions compared to the other fossil fuels and on the other hand coal will continue to playrnan important role in power generation in Europe and worldwide due to its advantages like the availability of the worldwide coal resources and their price stability compared to natural gas and oil.rnThe efficiency increase of coal-fired power plants is considered as a first step towards thernreduction of CO2 emissions. The existing potential in increasing the efficiency of coal-firedrnpower plants from today′s average values to today′s state-of-the-art can fulfil thernrequirements of the Kyoto protocol for the EU countries. As development programs for thernfurther increase of the efficiency beyond today′s state-of-the-art are already in place, thisrnpotential cannot be considered yet as exhausted.rnFurther steps for the reduction of CO2 emissions can be the retrofitting of existing coal-firedrnpower plants with the MEA technology. This option, which was applied already in the US forrnreasons of separating a CO2 stream out of a power plant′s flue gas, is already commerciallyrnavailable. Nevertheless, this application is connected with a reduction of net power outputrnand consequently of efficiency.rnAnother option is the oxygen-fired concept for both pulverised coal (PC) steam generatorsrnand circulating fluidised bed (CFB) steam generators. This concept uses pure oxygen plusrnrecirculated flue gas (mainly CO2) as a combustion medium, resulting in a flue gas streamrnwith a high CO2 concentration. Consequently, CO2 can be separated from the flue gas stream relatively easily. As such, this technology is geared towards CO2 mitigation, either throughrnthe retrofit application route or greenfield.rnFinally, this paper gives an overview over some other long term technology options for CO2rncapture like chemical looping, IGCC, or carbonate cycles and compares them in terms ofrndevelopment stage and of economic implications.
机译:一方面,由于其不利的C / H比使煤炭比其他化石燃料具有更高的比CO2排放量,另一方面,由于其优势,煤炭将继续在欧洲和世界范围内发电中发挥重要作用。与天然气和石油相比,全球煤炭资源的可用性及其价格稳定性。燃煤电厂的效率提高被认为是减少二氧化碳排放的第一步。将燃煤电厂的效率从当今的平均值提高到当今的最先进水平的现有潜力可以满足欧盟国家对《京都议定书》的要求。随着进一步提高效率的开发计划已经超出当今的最新水平,这种潜力还不能被认为已经耗尽。进一步减少二氧化碳排放的步骤可以是对现有燃煤发电的改造采用MEA技术的工厂。该选项已在美国用于将二氧化碳流从发电厂的烟气中分离出来的原因中,现已在商业上可用。但是,此应用程序会降低净功率输出,从而降低效率。另一个选择是用于粉煤(PC)蒸汽发生器和循环流化床(CFB)蒸汽发生器的氧气燃烧概念。这个概念使用纯氧气加上再循环的烟道气(主要是CO2)作为燃烧介质,从而产生了高CO2浓度的烟道气。因此,可以相对容易地从烟气流中分离出CO 2。因此,该技术旨在通过改型应用路线或新建区域来减少二氧化碳排放。最后,本文概述了一些其他长期捕获二氧化碳的技术选择,例如化学循环,IGCC或碳酸盐循环,并从开发方面进行了比较。阶段及其经济意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《POWER-GEN Europe 2005》|2005年|1-14|共14页
  • 会议地点 Milan(IT)
  • 作者单位

    Vattenfall Europe Generation AG Co. KG, Cottbus, Germany;

    ALSTOM Power Boiler GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号