首页> 外文会议>Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water Prevention, Dectection, and Remediation Conference November 11-13, 1998 Houston, Texas >An Augument Against Developing Tph-Based Tier 1 Ecological Screening Values to Evaluate petroleum Hydrocarbon Releases to Soil and Grounowater
【24h】

An Augument Against Developing Tph-Based Tier 1 Ecological Screening Values to Evaluate petroleum Hydrocarbon Releases to Soil and Grounowater

机译:反对发展基于Tph的方法1生态筛选值来评估石油烃向土壤和地下水的释放的争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The tiered approach described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) risk-based corrective action (RBCA) standard 9ASTM, 1995) is successful because it provides a technically defensible and efficient means of allocating resources to petroleum release sites. As originally written, the ASTM standard is limited to human health effects, although ASTM acknowledges the need to consoder nopn-human receptors in the RBCA process. Efforts to incorporate ecological risk into an ASTM RBCA-likeframework have been stymied by attempts to develop "Tier l" screening levels for ttal petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration rather than relying on data for discrete constituents as described in the ASTM standard. The development of such "TPH-based" criteria is fraught with technical difficulties, including (1) the accuracy or reliability of analytical measurements for "TPH" and the fact that TPH concentration have been demonstrated to not dorrelate with toxicity; (2) the lack of available or applicable toxicity data for whole petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures and the implausibility of developing such data due to the complexity of these mixtures and confounding weathering effects; and (3) the diffculty of designing accurate and defensible bioassay studies for multiple constituent mixtures in uncontrolled settings. These difficulties make it unlikely, if not impossible, that technically defensible criteria can be developed, even on a site-specific basis. More importantly, if site-specific criteria are developed, it will be tempting to broadly apply such criteria to other sites, regardless of their technical defensibility for those sites. Therefore, consitent with the ASTM RBCA standard, available resources should be focused on assessing potential ecological risks posed by petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater based on well-documented toxicity information for the individual chemical constituents within the petroleum hydrocarbon mixture rather than pursuing elusive TPH-based criteria.
机译:美国测试和材料学会(ASTM)基于风险的纠正措施(RBCA)标准9ASTM(1995)中描述的分层方法是成功的,因为它提供了技术上合理且有效的方法来将资源分配给石油释放场所。如最初所写,ASTM标准仅限于对人类健康的影响,尽管ASTM承认在RBCA过程中需要缓解nopn-人类受体。将生态风险纳入ASTM RBCA类框架的努力已受到阻碍,其方法是尝试开发总石油烃(TPH)浓度的“一级”筛选水平,而不是像ASTM标准中那样依赖离散成分的数据。这种基于“ TPH”的标准的开发面临着技术难题,其中包括:(1)“ TPH”分析测量的准确性或可靠性,以及已证明TPH浓度与毒性不相关的事实; (2)缺乏有关整个石油烃混合物的可用或适用的毒性数据,并且由于这些混合物的复杂性和混杂的风化作用而难以开发此类数据; (3)在不受控制的环境中难以为多种成分的混合物设计准确且可辩护的生物测定研究。这些困难使得即使是在特定地点的基础上,也不可能(即使不是不可能)制定技术上可行的标准。更重要的是,如果制定了特定于站点的标准,那么无论这些站点的技术防御力如何,都倾向于将这些标准广泛应用于其他站点。因此,在符合ASTM RBCA标准的前提下,应根据记录在案的石油碳氢化合物混合物中各个化学成分的毒性信息,将可用资源集中在评估土壤和地下水中石油碳氢化合物构成的潜在生态风险上,而不是寻求难以捉摸的TPH-基于标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号