首页> 外文会议>Petroleum hydrocabons conference/expo >An Augument Against Developing Tph-Based Tier 1 Ecological Screening Values to Evaluate petroleum Hydrocarbon Releases to Soil and Grounowater
【24h】

An Augument Against Developing Tph-Based Tier 1 Ecological Screening Values to Evaluate petroleum Hydrocarbon Releases to Soil and Grounowater

机译:反对开发基于TPH的TPH 1生态筛选值的争论,以评估石油烃释放到土壤和地下水

获取原文

摘要

The tiered approach described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) risk-based corrective action (RBCA) standard 9ASTM, 1995) is successful because it provides a technically defensible and efficient means of allocating resources to petroleum release sites. As originally written, the ASTM standard is limited to human health effects, although ASTM acknowledges the need to consoder nopn-human receptors in the RBCA process. Efforts to incorporate ecological risk into an ASTM RBCA-likeframework have been stymied by attempts to develop "Tier l" screening levels for ttal petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration rather than relying on data for discrete constituents as described in the ASTM standard. The development of such "TPH-based" criteria is fraught with technical difficulties, including (1) the accuracy or reliability of analytical measurements for "TPH" and the fact that TPH concentration have been demonstrated to not dorrelate with toxicity; (2) the lack of available or applicable toxicity data for whole petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures and the implausibility of developing such data due to the complexity of these mixtures and confounding weathering effects; and (3) the diffculty of designing accurate and defensible bioassay studies for multiple constituent mixtures in uncontrolled settings. These difficulties make it unlikely, if not impossible, that technically defensible criteria can be developed, even on a site-specific basis. More importantly, if site-specific criteria are developed, it will be tempting to broadly apply such criteria to other sites, regardless of their technical defensibility for those sites. Therefore, consitent with the ASTM RBCA standard, available resources should be focused on assessing potential ecological risks posed by petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater based on well-documented toxicity information for the individual chemical constituents within the petroleum hydrocarbon mixture rather than pursuing elusive TPH-based criteria.
机译:美国测试和材料(ASTM)基于风险的纠正措施(RBCA)标准9astm,1995)中描述的分层方法是成功的,因为它提供了在技术上可靠和有效地分配资源到石油释放站点的方法。如本来写的,ASTM标准仅限于人体健康效果,尽管ASTM承认在RBCA过程中需要巩固NOPN-人类受体的需求。努力将生态风险纳入ASTM RBCA的映射到ASTM RBCA-vicefrows的努力通过试图为TTAL石油烃(TPH)浓度产生“TPH)筛选水平而不是依赖于ASTM标准中所述的离散成分的数据。这种“基于TPH”标准的发展充满了技术困难,包括(1)“TPH”的分析测量的准确性或可靠性以及TPH浓度的证据表明不是毒性的不介相; (2)缺乏全石油碳氢化合物混合物的可用或适用的毒性数据以及由于这些混合物的复杂性和混淆风化效果而发展如此数据的局部局促; (3)在不受控制的环境中为多种组成混合物设计精确和可劣质生物测定研究的扩散。这些困难使得它不太可能,如果不是不可能的话,即使在特定于特别的基础上也可以开发技术上可靠的标准。更重要的是,如果开发了特定于站点的标准,则令人诱人地向其他网站应用此类标准,无论它们对这些网站的技术可靠性如何。因此,根据ASTM RBCA标准,可用资源应侧重于评估土壤和地下水中的石油碳氢化合物潜在的生态风险,基于石油烃混合物内的个体化学成分的良好记录的毒性信息,而不是追求难以捉摸的TPH-基于标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号