首页> 外文会议>Optical measurement systems for industrial inspection VII >Measurement of surface resistivity/conductivity of carbon steel in 5-20ppm of KGR-134 inhibited seawater by holographic interferometry techniques
【24h】

Measurement of surface resistivity/conductivity of carbon steel in 5-20ppm of KGR-134 inhibited seawater by holographic interferometry techniques

机译:全息干涉法测量5-20ppm KGR-134抑制海水中碳钢的表面电阻率/电导率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Optical interferometry techniques were used for the first time to measure the surface resistivity/conductivity of carbon steel samples in blank seawater and in seawater with different concentrations of a corrosion inhibitor, without any physical contact. The measurement of the surface resistivity/conductivity of carbon steel samples was carried out in blank seawater and in seawater with a concentration range of 5-20ppm of KGR-134 corrosion inhibitor, at room temperature. In this investigation, the real-time holographic interferometry was carried out to measure the thickness of anodic dissolved layer or the total thickness, Utotal, of formed oxide layer of carbon steel samples during the alternating current (AC) impedance of the samples in blank seawater and in 5-20 ppm KGR-134 inhibited seawater, respectively. In other words, the surface resistivity/conductivity of carbon steel samples was determined simultaneously by holographic interferometry, an electromagnetic method, and by the Electrochemical Impedance (E.I) spectroscopy, an electronic method. In addition, a mathematical model was derived in order to correlate between the AC impedance (resistance) and to the surface (orthogonal) displacement of the surface of the samples in solutions. In other words, a proportionality constant (surface resistivity (ρ) or surface conductivity(σ)=1/[ surface resistivity (ρ)] between the determined AC impedance (by EIS technique) and the orthogonal displacement (by the optical interferometry techniques) was obtained. Consequently the values ρ and σ of the carbon steel samples in solutions were obtained. Also, the value of ρ from other source were used for comparison sake with the calculated values of this investigation. This study revealed that the oxide film of the carbon steel sample has been removed from the surface of the sample, in the blank seawater. Therefore, the corresponding value of the resistivity to such layer remained the same as the value of the resistivity of the carbon steel sample in air, around 1x10-5 Ohms-cm. On the contrary, the measured values of the resistivity of the carbon steel samples were 4.91x107 Ohms-cm , 5.1x107 Ohms-cm, and 4.2x107 Ohms-cm in 5ppm,10ppm, and 20ppm KGR-134 inhibited seawater solutions, respectively. Furthermore, the determined value range of the ρ of the formed oxide layers, 1.9x107 Ohms-cm to 4.91x107 Ohms-cm, is found in a reasonable agreement with the one found in literature for the Fe Oxide-hydroxides, i.e., Goethite(α-FeOOH) and for the Lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), 1x109 Ohms-cm. The ρ value of the Goethite(α-FeOOH) and of the Lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), 1x109 Ohms-cm, was found slightly higher than the ρ value range of the formed oxide layer of the present study. This because the former value was determined by a DC method rather than by an electromagnetic method,i.e., holographic interferometry, with applications of EIS, i.e., AC method. As a result, erroneous measurements were recorded due to the introduction of heat to Fe oxide-hydroxides. This led to higher value of the resistivity of the Goethite(α-FeOOH) and for the Lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) ),1x109 Ohms-cm, compared to the determined value range of the resistivity of the formed oxide layers, 4.2x107 Ohms-cm to 5.1x107 Ohms-cm.
机译:光学干涉技术首次用于测量空白海水和含不同浓度腐蚀抑制剂的海水中碳钢样品的表面电阻率/电导率,没有任何物理接触。碳钢样品的表面电阻率/电导率的测量是在空白海水中以及在KGR-134缓蚀剂浓度范围为5-20ppm的海水中于室温进行的。在这项研究中,进行了实时全息干涉测量,以测量空白海水中样品的交流(AC)阻抗期间,碳钢样品的阳极溶解层的厚度或形成的氧化层的总厚度Utotal。和在5-20 ppm的KGR-134抑制海水中。换句话说,碳钢样品的表面电阻率/电导率是同时通过全息干涉法(电磁法)和电化学阻抗(E.I)光谱法(电子法)测定的。此外,推导了数学模型,以便将交流阻抗(电阻)与溶液中样品表面的表面(正交)位移相关联。换句话说,在确定的交流阻抗(通过EIS技术)和正交位移(通过光学干涉技术)之间的比例常数(表面电阻率(ρ)或表面电导率(σ)= 1 / [表面电阻率(ρ)]结果得到了溶液中碳钢样品的ρ和σ值,并且将其他来源的ρ值与本研究的计算值进行了比较,该研究表明碳钢样品已从空白海水中的样品表面去除,因此,对应于该层的电阻率值与空气中碳钢样品的电阻率值相同,约为1x10-5相反,在5ppm,10ppm和20ppm KGR-134抑制的海水中,碳钢样品的电阻率测量值分别为4.91x107 Ohms-cm,5.1x107 Ohms-cm和4.2x107 Ohms-cm。解决方案分别地。此外,确定的形成氧化物层的ρ的取值范围为1.9x107 Ohms-cm至4.91x107 Ohms-cm,与文献中关于Fe氧化物-氢氧化物即针铁矿( α-FeO​​OH)和纤铁矿(γ-FeOOH),1x109欧姆-厘米。针铁矿(α-FeO​​OH)和纤铁矿(γ-FeOOH)的ρ值1x109 Ohms-cm被发现比本研究中形成的氧化物层的ρ值范围稍高。这是因为前者的值是通过DC方法而不是电磁方法,即全息干涉法,通过EIS方法,即AC方法来确定的。结果,由于热量被引入到氢氧化铁氢氧化物中,所以记录了错误的测量结果。与形成的氧化物层的电阻率的确定值范围4.2x107 Ohms相比,这导致针铁矿(α-FeO​​OH)和针铁锰矿(γ-FeOOH)的电阻率值更高,为1x109欧姆-厘米。 -cm至5.1x107 Ohms-cm。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号