首页> 外文会议>Offshore technology conference (OTC 2001) >Successfully Managing Drilling-Fluid Losses in Multiple Highly Depleted Sands
【24h】

Successfully Managing Drilling-Fluid Losses in Multiple Highly Depleted Sands

机译:成功管理多个高度贫化的沙子中的钻井液流失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Successfully drilling through depleted sands to reachrndeeper targets often demands a delicate balancing actrnbetween maintaining mechanical stability in normally andrnover-pressured shales, while controlling fluid losses duernto hydraulic fracturing. A host of considerations go intornthe planning process, including whether furtherrnproduction from the depleted zones is planned.rnFor a porous formation, it is generally accepted thatrnhydraulic fracturing pressure is partially dependent uponrnformation pore pressure.1,2 However, the modelsrncommonly used to predict both fracture initiation andrnfracture propagation are often unable to predict thernchanges in hydraulic fracturing pressures due torndepletion. The authors believe this is due more to therndifficulty in predicting the data required to link porernpressure variations to stress, rather than a deficiency inrnthe existing models. More significantly, these modelsrntypically assume no flow, and thus are not valid wherernthere is significant fluid loss to the formation.rnDue to the prohibitive cost of a new North Sea well, arnstability analysis was performed to determine thernfeasibility of sidetracking from an existing well and thenrndirectionally drilling through two (2) highly depleted sandrnformations with a single hole section.rnThe case study presented compares the originalrnmechanical stability and hydraulic fracturing estimatesrnwith the actual mud weights used to successfullyrncomplete this difficult drilling operation. Descriptions ofrnhole instability and fluid losses are presented along withrnthe drilling fluid parameters used to combat them.rnMethods used for estimating formation pore pressure, insiturnstresses and formation rock properties are alsorndescribed. In addition, possible explanations for therndifferences between the planned and actual stabilityrnestimates are explored, with future recommendations forrnsimilar operations.
机译:在贫化的砂岩中成功钻探到更深的目标时,通常需要一种微妙的平衡作用,既要保持常压和超压页岩的机械稳定性,又要控制由于水力压裂而造成的流体损失。在规划过程中需要考虑很多因素,包括是否计划从贫乏区进一步开采。对于多孔地层,人们普遍认为,水力压裂压力部分取决于地层孔隙压力。1,2但是,模型通常用于预测两种压裂。初始和裂缝扩展通常无法预测由于损耗而造成的水力压裂压力的变化。作者认为,这更多是由于难以预测将孔隙压力变化与应力联系起来所需的数据,而不是现有模型的不足。更重要的是,这些模型通常假定没有流量,因此在地层有大量流体流失的情况下是无效的。由于新北海油井的成本高昂,因此进行了可稳定性分析,以确定从现有油井侧向追踪的可行性,然后进行定向通过单孔断面钻探两(2)个高度贫化的砂岩地层。本案例研究将原始的机械稳定性和水力压裂估算值与成功完成该困难钻探操作所用的实际泥浆重量进行了比较。介绍了井眼失稳和流体损失的描述,以及与井眼失稳有关的钻井液参数。描述了估算地层孔隙压力,内应力和地层岩石特性的方法。此外,还探讨了对计划的和实际的稳定性估算值之间的差异的可能解释,并为类似的操作提供了未来的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号