首页> 外文会议>OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans >Japan's First and Second Basic Plan on Ocean Policy and the Government Annual Reports; Considering the Formation of the Third Basic Plan on Ocean Policy
【24h】

Japan's First and Second Basic Plan on Ocean Policy and the Government Annual Reports; Considering the Formation of the Third Basic Plan on Ocean Policy

机译:日本第一,第二个海洋政策基本计划和政府年度报告;考虑制定第三项海洋政策基本计划

获取原文

摘要

December 2017. The First Basic Plan on Ocean Policy was determined in 2008, and five years later, current Second Basic Plan was determined in 2013. Naturally, some changes of the contents were made between them. Also, the Government Annual Report had been publicized in each following fiscal year, showing what kind of political measures had been done on each policy identified in the five-year Basic Plan. But we must pay attention to the phrase of the Act, “Bearing in mind the change on the situation” and “evaluation of the effect of measures with regard to the oceans”. While the changes to the situation with regard to the oceans have often been publicized in the Government Annual Reports and while Councilors' Meeting reports sometimes pointed out the necessity to do so, there are few documents on the evaluation of the effectiveness of measures implemented with regard to the oceans. According to the paper by a study group headed by the author appeared in the Journal of Japan Society of Ocean Policy No.7, issued in November 2017, the Government Annual Reports sometimes included no description for several policies listed in the Basic Plan on Ocean Policy, and also it was difficult to understand the policies continuity, the priorities, and whether or not the policies were newly started. So, the author, with other colleagues of the study group, tried to make suggestions and proposal that the Government Annual Report should be treated as an important document for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the measures being implemented by the Government and further proposes that the Councilors' Meeting might be the responsible body to perform such evaluation. Then, author examined and re-confirmed the differences between the First and Second Basic Ocean Plan and discussed what would be desirable to be included in the Third Basic Plan on Ocean Policy.
机译:2017年12月。第一个海洋政策基本计划于2008年确定,五年后,当前的第二个基本计划于2013年确定。自然,它们之间的内容有所变化。另外,在随后的每个财政年度中都发布了政府年度报告,显示了对五年基本计划中确定的每项政策采取了何种政治措施。但是,我们必须注意该法令的措辞,“铭记形势的变化”和“对海洋措施的效果进行评估”。虽然海洋状况的变化经常在政府年度报告中公布,而议员会议的报告有时指出这样做的必要性,但很少有文件评估对有关方面所采取措施的有效性到海洋。根据以作者为首的研究组在2017年11月发布的《日本海洋政策学会第7号》上的论文,政府年度报告有时不包括《海洋政策基本计划》中列出的几项政策的描述。 ,而且很难理解政策的连续性,优先级以及政策是否是新制定的。因此,作者与研究小组的其他同事试图提出建议,将政府年度报告作为评估政府实施措施有效性的重要文件,并进一步建议议员会议可能是进行这种评估的负责机构。然后,作者审查并再次确认了第一和第二个基本海洋计划之间的差异,并讨论了将第三份海洋政策基本计划包括在内的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号