【24h】

America's Current Noise Policy – Success or Failure?

机译:美国当前的噪音政策–成功或失败?

获取原文

摘要

The Congress declared in 1972 that it is "…the policy of the United States to promote an environment for allAmericans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare." Today, more than three decades later, we stilldo not have such an environment. Responsibility for America's current noise policy is scattered among more than adozen agencies of the Federal government, as well as State and local authorities. The broad constituenciesconcerned with noise in America include: manufacturers, legislatures, governmental agencies, local authorities, nongovernmentalorganizations, and the general public. Each may be divided into sub-constituencies. The objectivesand motivations of a particular constituency strongly influence how noise policy is viewed. Some would argue thatcurrent policy is a striking example of public policy failure; others that a refunding of the stalled Federal program ofthe 1980s would turn failure into success, and still others are indifferent. The apparent motives of the constituenciesare examined in an effort to evaluate their positions on the success or failure of current noise policy. The purpose ofthis evaluation is to identify those individuals and groups that can be expected to play major roles in thedevelopment of a new, more effective, noise policy for America.
机译:大会于1972年宣布,它是“......美国政策促进所有环境 美国人没有危害他们的健康或福利的噪音。“今天,超过三十年后,我们仍然 没有这样的环境。对美国当前噪声政策的责任分散在一个以上 联邦政府的十几个机构以及州和地方当局。广泛的选民 关注美国的噪音包括:制造商,立法机构,政府机构,地方当局,非政府组织 组织和公众。每个都可以分为子组分。目标 特定选项的动机强烈影响噪声政策如何看待。有些人会争辩 目前的政策是公共政策失败的一个引人注目的例子;其他人,退还停滞不前的联邦方案 20世纪80年代将失败成功,仍然是漠不关心的。选区的表观动机 审查努力评估他们对当前噪声政策的成功或失败的立场。的目的 该评估是识别这些个人和群体,可以预期在此期间发挥重要作用 为美国开发一个新的,更有效,噪音政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号