首页> 外文会议>Networking, Sensing and Control, 2009. ICNSC '09 >Centralized versus decentralized route choice control in DCV-based baggage handling systems
【24h】

Centralized versus decentralized route choice control in DCV-based baggage handling systems

机译:基于DCV的行李处理系统中的集中式和分散式路线选择控制

获取原文

摘要

The process of handling baggage in an airport is time-critical. Currently, the fastest way to transport the luggage is to use destination coded vehicles (DCVs). These vehicles transport the bags at high speed on a ldquominirdquo railway network. The route of each DCV has to be computed in order to optimize the performance of the system. In this paper we determine an event-based model of a DCV-based baggage handling system and we compare centralized and decentralized control methods for routing the DCVs through the network. The proposed centralized control methods are optimal control and model predictive control. Due to the large computational effort required, we also analyze a fully decentralized control approach. In this case, each junction has its own local controller for positioning the switch into the junction or out of it. The considered control methods are compared for several scenarios. Results indicate that optimal control becomes intractable when a large stream of bags has to be handled, while MPC can still be used to suboptimally solve the problem. On the other hand, the decentralized control method usually gives worse results than those obtained when using MPC, but with very low computation time.
机译:在机场处理行李的过程非常关键。当前,运输行李的最快方法是使用目的地编码车辆(DCV)。这些车辆在ldminiminirdquo铁路网络上高速运输行李。必须计算每个DCV的路线,以优化系统性能。在本文中,我们确定了基于DCV的行李处理系统的基于事件的模型,并比较了通过网络路由DCV的集中式和分散式控制方法。提出的集中控制方法是最优控制和模型预测控制。由于需要大量的计算工作,我们还分析了一种完全分散的控制方法。在这种情况下,每个结点都有其自己的本地控制器,用于将开关定位在结点内或外。比较了几种情况下考虑的控制方法。结果表明,当必须处理大量袋子时,最佳控制变得很棘手,而MPC仍可用于次优解决问题。另一方面,分散控制方法通常比使用MPC时获得的结果差,但计算时间却很短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号