首页> 外文会议>NAWTEC20;ASME annual North American waste to energy conference >DO ODORS AT A WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY INDICATE A RISK TO HEALTH?
【24h】

DO ODORS AT A WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY INDICATE A RISK TO HEALTH?

机译:废物管理设施中的气味是否会危害健康?

获取原文

摘要

Odor control is a frequent issue at facilities that process municipal solid waste. Even waste-to-energy facilities, which are typically operated under 'negative pressure,' may be less than 100% effective at preventing the occasional release of odorous emissions. When odors travel off-property to nearby residents and businesses, the tangible exposure often elicits concerns about the specific chemicals responsible for the odor and the potential for the emissions to affect public health. However, because the gaseous compounds that may lead to objectionable off-site odors are generally different than those that might result in adverse health effects, conditions of odor and risk are not as closely linked as is sometimes assumed. While odors can be assessed through personal observations, the assessment of risk requires detailed knowledge of the composition of the emitted gases. The gas produced from the aerobic decay of municipal solid waste contains a different mix of chemicals that are not as well characterized than gas produced from the anaerobic decay of waste in a landfill (which has been analyzed by the U.S. EPA and others). Air samples were recently collected from the tipping floor of a waste-to-energy facility, analyzed for chemical composition, and evaluated for their potential to lead to off-site health risks. The composition of the gas was found to be similar to published data from other MSW handling facilities, and includes both basic hydrocarbons and some EPA-designated Hazardous Air Pollutants. Thirty-two different volatile organic compounds were detected. Ethanol was found to be the most prevalent compound, almost two orders of magnitude greater in concentration than other chemicals. Additional compounds identified in the gas samples include (in order of abundance) methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, sec-butanol, isopentane, acetaldehyde, butane, isopropyl alcohol, limonene, and 1-propanol. A case-specific atmospheric dispersion of the gases was modeled to predict off-site concentrations much smaller than levels known to cause adverse health effects. Based on odor characteristics of the gas, generically extrapolating the study to other settings suggests that short-term odorous conditions due to MSW management facilities (waste-to-energy facilities, transfer stations, etc.) do not typically correspond to significant long-term health risks.
机译:在处理城市固体废物的设施中,气味控制是一个经常发生的问题。即使是通常在“负压”下运行的废物转化能源设施,在防止偶尔释放气味排放方面也可能不到100%有效。当气味从附近转移到附近的居民和企业时,有形的暴露通常引起对引起该气味的特定化学物质以及排放物可能影响公众健康的担忧。但是,由于可能导致令人讨厌的异味的气态化合物通常不同于可能导致不良健康影响的气态化合物,因此气味条件和风险状况之间的联系并不像有时所假设的那样紧密。虽然可以通过个人观察来评估气味,但对风险的评估需要对排放气体成分的详细了解。由城市固体废物的需氧腐烂产生的气体所含化学物质的混合物与垃圾填埋场中的废物厌氧腐烂所产生的气体的特征不同(已由美国EPA和其他机构进行了分析)。最近,从废物转化为能源的设施的倾卸地板上收集了空气样本,对其化学成分进行了分析,并评估了其潜在导致场外健康风险的可能性。发现该气体的成分与其他城市固体废弃物处理设施发布的数据相似,包括基本碳氢化合物和一些EPA指定的有害空气污染物。检测到32种不同的挥发性有机化合物。发现乙醇是最普遍的化合物,其浓度比其他化学品高出近两个数量级。气体样品中鉴定出的其他化合物包括(按含量顺序)甲乙酮,丙酮,仲丁醇,异戊烷,乙醛,丁烷,异丙醇,li烯和1-丙醇。对特定案例的气体在大气中的扩散进行了建模,以预测异地浓度远小于已知会对健康造成不利影响的浓度。根据气体的气味特征,一般将研究推论到其他设置表明,城市固体垃圾管理设施(废物转化为能源的设施,转运站等)造成的短期气味状况通常不对应于长期的重要影响健康风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号