首页> 外文会议>Navigating the Global Landscape for the New Composites >COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE DAMAGE EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES FOR CFRP LOW VELOCITY IMPACT DAMAGE
【24h】

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE DAMAGE EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES FOR CFRP LOW VELOCITY IMPACT DAMAGE

机译:CFRP低速碰撞损伤非破坏性损伤评估方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Damage evaluation for fiber-reinforced polymer composites has been a topic of interest for morernthan 30 years, and for good reason. With damage modes significantly different than monolithicrnalloys, engineers have had to design composite structures to tolerate delamination, fiberbreakage,rnmatrix cracking, and fiber-matrix debonding. Accomplishment of this goal hasrnrequired understanding how and why these damage modes manifest themselves and grow torncritical levels, even when the damage is barely visible from the surface. To this end, many nondestructivernevaluation techniques have been developed, each with their advantages andrndisadvantages to characterize these damage forms. In this study, a series of non-destructivernevaluation techniques are performed and evaluated on a set of damaged carbon fiber reinforcedrnplastic (CFRP) specimens that have been subjected to varying levels of incident kinetic energyrnfrom low velocity impact (LVI). Specifically, 3-D x-ray computed tomography (CT), activernthermography, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and vibrothermography have beenrnsystematically utilized for evaluation of the specimens. The advantages and disadvantages arernthoroughly explored and reported for each method in order to gain insight into the limitation ofrneach of the damage detection methods and the damage morphology resulting from LVI.
机译:三十多年来,纤维增强聚合物复合材料的损伤评估一直是人们关注的话题,这是有充分理由的。由于破坏模式与整体式合金显着不同,工程师不得不设计复合结构以承受分层,纤维断裂,基体开裂和纤维基体剥离。要实现该目标,就需要了解即使在表面上几乎看不到损害的情况下,这些损害模式如何以及为何表现出来并达到临界水平。为此,已经开发了许多非破坏性评估技术,每种技术都有其优点和缺点来表征这些损坏形式。在这项研究中,对一组受损的碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)标本进行了一系列的非破坏性评估技术,这些标本已受到来自低速冲击(LVI)的变化水平的入射动能的影响。具体地,已经系统地利用3-D X射线计算机断层摄影术(CT),主动热成像术,电阻抗断层摄影术(EIT)和振动热成像术来评估样本。深入探讨了每种方法的优缺点,并进行了报道,以了解每种损伤检测方法的局限性以及LVI造成的损伤形态。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 North Charleston SC(US)
  • 作者单位

    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringrnUniversity of California, DavisrnDavis CA 95616,Sandia National LaboratoriesrnLivermore, CA 94550;

    Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringrnUniversity of California, DavisrnDavis CA 95616;

    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringrnUniversity of California, DavisrnDavis CA 95616;

    Department of Mechanical EngineeringrnCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversityrnSan Luis Obispo, CA 93407;

    Sandia National LaboratoriesrnLivermore, CA 94550;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号